Recognition Versus Action: An Examination of Physical Education, Physical Activity, and Youth Sport Policy in Ireland

Purpose: Policy in physical education (PE), physical activity (PA), and youth sport (YS) plays a pivotal role in shaping youth health and wellbeing. A critical distinction exists between policies that acknowledge these domains by recognising their importance and those that address them through defined actions, strategies, and interventions. The aim of this study was to examine how national policies in Ireland conceptualise and engage with PE, PA, and YS, and to evaluate the extent to which policies move from acknowledgement to implementation across these domains. Methods: A content mapping analysis of national policy documentation related to PE, PA, and YS in Ireland was conducted. A three-step systematic approach of policymaker identification, policy identification, and domain alignment was followed. Deductive content analysis determined domain alignment of active policy. An inductive matrix was constructed to classify whether each domain was acknowledged (i.e. recognised or referenced without concrete plans) or addressed (i.e. accompanied by specific actions, implementation strategies, or targets), adapted from Chhetri & Zacarias (2021). The lead author independently coded the data, resolving discrepancies through discussion with co-authors to ensure consistency and rigour. Results: Findings reveal fragmented engagement across the three domains. PA was most frequently addressed, with 55.6% (n = 10) of policymakers including concrete strategies. In contrast, 22.2% (n = 4) addressed YS, and only one addressed both PA and PE. A single policymaker addressed all three domains explicitly. Notably, PE was never addressed in isolation and was often embedded under broader education or health frameworks. While 33.3% (n = 6) acknowledged all three domains, 38.9% (n = 7) acknowledged only PA, often without specifying implementation measures. Conclusion: These findings highlight the need for a more coherent and balanced policy landscape in PE, PA, and YS. Moving from acknowledgement to implementation is essential to realising intended health outcomes. Greater integration and specificity in policy design can support more equitable representation of domains, youth health, and foster holistic, lifelong engagement with physical activity among youth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33607/bjshs.v5isupplement.1890
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognition Versus Action: An Examination of Physical Education, Physical Activity, and Youth Sport Policy in Ireland

Mairéad Grogan, Brendan O'Keeffe, Ann MacPhail, João Pedro Eusébio Guimarães da Costa
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Recognition Versus Action: An Examination of Physical Education, Physical Activity, and Youth Sport Policy in Ireland

Mairéad Grogan, Brendan O'Keeffe, Ann MacPhail, João Pedro Eusébio Guimarães da Costa
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Policy in physical education (PE), physical activity (PA), and youth sport (YS) plays a pivotal role in shaping youth health and wellbeing. A critical distinction exists between policies that acknowledge these domains by recognising their importance and those that address them through defined actions, strategies, and interventions. The aim of this study was to examine how national policies in Ireland conceptualise and engage with PE, PA, and YS, and to evaluate the extent to which policies move from acknowledgement to implementation across these domains. Methods: A content mapping analysis of national policy documentation related to PE, PA, and YS in Ireland was conducted. A three-step systematic approach of policymaker identification, policy identification, and domain alignment was followed. Deductive content analysis determined domain alignment of active policy. An inductive matrix was constructed to classify whether each domain was acknowledged (i.e. recognised or referenced without concrete plans) or addressed (i.e. accompanied by specific actions, implementation strategies, or targets), adapted from Chhetri & Zacarias (2021). The lead author independently coded the data, resolving discrepancies through discussion with co-authors to ensure consistency and rigour. Results: Findings reveal fragmented engagement across the three domains. PA was most frequently addressed, with 55.6% (n = 10) of policymakers including concrete strategies. In contrast, 22.2% (n = 4) addressed YS, and only one addressed both PA and PE. A single policymaker addressed all three domains explicitly. Notably, PE was never addressed in isolation and was often embedded under broader education or health frameworks. While 33.3% (n = 6) acknowledged all three domains, 38.9% (n = 7) acknowledged only PA, often without specifying implementation measures. Conclusion: These findings highlight the need for a more coherent and balanced policy landscape in PE, PA, and YS. Moving from acknowledgement to implementation is essential to realising intended health outcomes. Greater integration and specificity in policy design can support more equitable representation of domains, youth health, and foster holistic, lifelong engagement with physical activity among youth.

Baltic Journal of Sport and Health SciencesVol. 5(Supplement)
University of Limerick (IE), University College Cork (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.