Assessing The Inclusion Of Federally Qualified Health Centers In Medicare Advantage Networks

Medicare Advantage (MA) disproportionately enrolls low-income and racial and ethnic minority populations that may benefit from access to federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Using 2022 FQHC provider and MA network data, we examined the inclusion of FQHCs in MA provider networks. On average, these networks included 57 percent of FQHCs in their service areas, but 30 percent of contracts had narrow FQHC networks, defined as including fewer than one-quarter of available FQHCs. Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and Black beneficiaries were more likely to be enrolled in a narrow-network contract than White beneficiaries by 26, 20, and 5 percentage points, respectively, which appears to have been driven by area-specific factors. Contracts lacking a star rating, operating in a single state, or enrolling fewer disabled or rural beneficiaries were more likely to have narrow networks. As MA enrollment grows, efforts to monitor in-network access to community-based safety-net providers are important.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2025.00881
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing The Inclusion Of Federally Qualified Health Centers In Medicare Advantage Networks

David J. Meyers, Amal N. Trivedi, Nicole C. Giron, Brad Wright et al.
Health Affairs
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Assessing The Inclusion Of Federally Qualified Health Centers In Medicare Advantage Networks

David J. Meyers, Amal N. Trivedi, Nicole C. Giron, Brad Wright, Megan B. Cole
article en

Abstract

Medicare Advantage (MA) disproportionately enrolls low-income and racial and ethnic minority populations that may benefit from access to federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Using 2022 FQHC provider and MA network data, we examined the inclusion of FQHCs in MA provider networks. On average, these networks included 57 percent of FQHCs in their service areas, but 30 percent of contracts had narrow FQHC networks, defined as including fewer than one-quarter of available FQHCs. Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and Black beneficiaries were more likely to be enrolled in a narrow-network contract than White beneficiaries by 26, 20, and 5 percentage points, respectively, which appears to have been driven by area-specific factors. Contracts lacking a star rating, operating in a single state, or enrolling fewer disabled or rural beneficiaries were more likely to have narrow networks. As MA enrollment grows, efforts to monitor in-network access to community-based safety-net providers are important.

Health AffairsVol. 45(2)
Harvard University (US), University of South Carolina (US), John Brown University (US), Brown University (US), Providence VA Medical Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.