Machine learning-based COVID-19 prognostic models lag behind in reporting quality: findings from a TRIPOD/TRIPOD + AI systematic review
Lower adherence among machine learning studies reflects the relatively recent publication of the TRIPOD + AI guidelines (April 2024), which postdate many of the included studies. Both conventional and machine learning-based prediction models showed insufficient reporting, with major gaps in model description and performance reporting. Greater compliance with reporting guidelines is critical to improving the clarity, reproducibility, and clinical value of prediction model research.
Authors
- Persefoni Talimtzi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1926-8299)
- Ioannis Partheniadis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8682-4371)
- Anna-Bettina Haidich
- Adriani Nikolakopoulou
Institutions
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
- Published
- 2026-02-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-026-00218-x
- Primary Topic
- COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00