<i>‘Just Love Us, We'll Do the Rest’</i> . Competing Repertoires of Agrarian Anti‐Environmentalism

ABSTRACT Agrarian mobilisations no longer target solely public authorities, legislation and its economic and professional consequences. They are now increasingly structured to respond to other social movements and produce a structured discourse aimed at public opinion. In France, the denunciation of ‘agribashing’ generated significant activity on Twitter (now X) between 2018 and 2020, before disappearing almost completely thereafter. Drawing on online data analysis and traditional qualitative methods (interviews and observations of public and private events), this article analyses how the agrarian question shifted onto a public, controversial terrain, which reframes economic and environmental issues in terms of a moral question. We show the emergence of a new ‘positive’ repertoire of contention, promoting technological modernity and the responsible ethics of producers, which compete with a more contentious repertoire that voices the resentment of a large number of farmers faced with what they perceive as an ‘unfair’ criticism from civil society. The divergence of repertoires can thus be interpreted as an internal backlash within the hegemonic agrarian discourse on productivism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociologia Ruralis
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.70026
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Just Love Us, We'll Do the Rest’ . Competing Repertoires of Agrarian Anti‐Environmentalism

Baptiste Kotras, S. Brunier
Sociologia Ruralis
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

‘Just Love Us, We'll Do the Rest’ . Competing Repertoires of Agrarian Anti‐Environmentalism

Baptiste Kotras, S. Brunier
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Agrarian mobilisations no longer target solely public authorities, legislation and its economic and professional consequences. They are now increasingly structured to respond to other social movements and produce a structured discourse aimed at public opinion. In France, the denunciation of ‘agribashing’ generated significant activity on Twitter (now X) between 2018 and 2020, before disappearing almost completely thereafter. Drawing on online data analysis and traditional qualitative methods (interviews and observations of public and private events), this article analyses how the agrarian question shifted onto a public, controversial terrain, which reframes economic and environmental issues in terms of a moral question. We show the emergence of a new ‘positive’ repertoire of contention, promoting technological modernity and the responsible ethics of producers, which compete with a more contentious repertoire that voices the resentment of a large number of farmers faced with what they perceive as an ‘unfair’ criticism from civil society. The divergence of repertoires can thus be interpreted as an internal backlash within the hegemonic agrarian discourse on productivism.

Sociologia RuralisVol. 66(2)
Centre de Sociologie des Organisations (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<i>‘Just Love Us, We'll Do the Rest’</i> . Competing Repertoires of Agrarian Anti‐Environmentalism — Baptiste Kotras, S. Brunier · Sociologia Ruralis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS