The roles of the SCAB Nominations and Activities systems in the ATLAS-CERN speakers selection

Considering CERN’s prosperous environment, developing groundbreaking research in physics, and pushing technology’s barriers, CERN members participate in many talks and conferences every year. However, given that the ATLAS experiment has around 6000 members and more than one could be qualified to present the same talk, the experiment developed metrics to prioritize them. Currently, ATLAS is organized in a tree structure with groups and subgroups, called Activities. Each Activity has responsible members such as the conveners or sub-conveners, project leaders, and activity coordinators. Because of the hierarchy mentioned, the member’s nomination will work its way up the branches, providing the upper levels with input from the lower ones. Previously, this process was not automated and happened through the exchange of spreadsheets, not providing these conveners and coordinators with the big picture of the nominations’ priorities and reasons. To improve this process, two systems were developed by the ATLAS Glance team: Activities and SCAB Nominations. The Activities interface provides a user-friendly view to manage the activities tree structure, the coordinators of each activity, and their allowed actions in the nomination process. The SCAB Nominations interface automates the nomination process of the ATLAS Speakers Committee Advisory Board, allowing all the coordinators to give their nominees priorities, and justify them in comments. These two systems contribute to a more holistic process for selecting collaboration members to present at a specific conference. This contribution delves into their specifications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202533701086/pdf
Primary Topic
International Science and Diplomacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The roles of the SCAB Nominations and Activities systems in the ATLAS-CERN speakers selection

Gabriela Lemos Lúcidi Pinhão, Carolina Niklaus Moreira da Rocha Rodrigues, Rodrigo Coura Torres, Pedro Henrique Goes Afonso et al.
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
International Science and Diplomacy
article

The roles of the SCAB Nominations and Activities systems in the ATLAS-CERN speakers selection

Gabriela Lemos Lúcidi Pinhão, Carolina Niklaus Moreira da Rocha Rodrigues, Rodrigo Coura Torres, Pedro Henrique Goes Afonso, Ana Clara Loureiro Cruz, Jose Manoel Seixas, Natanael Nunes de Moura Junior, Leonardo Mira Marins, Rafaella Lenzi Romano
article en

Abstract

Considering CERN’s prosperous environment, developing groundbreaking research in physics, and pushing technology’s barriers, CERN members participate in many talks and conferences every year. However, given that the ATLAS experiment has around 6000 members and more than one could be qualified to present the same talk, the experiment developed metrics to prioritize them. Currently, ATLAS is organized in a tree structure with groups and subgroups, called Activities. Each Activity has responsible members such as the conveners or sub-conveners, project leaders, and activity coordinators. Because of the hierarchy mentioned, the member’s nomination will work its way up the branches, providing the upper levels with input from the lower ones. Previously, this process was not automated and happened through the exchange of spreadsheets, not providing these conveners and coordinators with the big picture of the nominations’ priorities and reasons. To improve this process, two systems were developed by the ATLAS Glance team: Activities and SCAB Nominations. The Activities interface provides a user-friendly view to manage the activities tree structure, the coordinators of each activity, and their allowed actions in the nomination process. The SCAB Nominations interface automates the nomination process of the ATLAS Speakers Committee Advisory Board, allowing all the coordinators to give their nominees priorities, and justify them in comments. These two systems contribute to a more holistic process for selecting collaboration members to present at a specific conference. This contribution delves into their specifications.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
International Science and Diplomacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.