Socioeconomic health equity with malaria burden: quantifying slope (Relative) index of inequity in malaria infection outcomes in the Southeastern-coastal Tanzania

Malaria remains a significant public health challenge in Tanzania, with socioeconomic factors playing crucial roles in disease outcomes. While previous studies have explored the relationship between socioeconomic status and malaria infection, quantitative assessment of equity condition in malaria outcomes remains understudied. This study innovatively applies Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and Relative Index of Inequality (RII) to quantify the equity conditions between socioeconomics and malaria burden in three Districts located in the Southeastern coast of Tanzania. Data from the baseline survey of the China-Tanzania Demonstration Project on Malaria Control conducted in 2019 were analyzed. Key variables included: (1) socioeconomic status quantified through Principal Component Analysis incorporating household infrastructure, asset ownership, and social potential; (2) malaria infection outcomes, including blood test results, treatment costs, and days absent from work/education (days off). Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to assess socioeconomic impacts, while SII and RII were calculated to measure health equity conditions across socioeconomic strata in three districts of Rufiji, Kilwa, and Kibiti. Higher socioeconomic status was associated with a lower risk of malaria infection (OR = 0.9975, 95% CI: 0.9972–0.9978), lower treatment costs (coefficient = -3.13, P < 0.05), and fewer days off work (coefficient = -0.0017, P < 0.05). Rufiji district demonstrated the most significant socioeconomic equality in malaria infection risk (SII=-12.62%, 95%CI: -17.19% to -8.06%; RII = 1.28, 95%CI: 1.12 to 1.55), treatment cost (SII = 837.769, 95%CI: -1182.44 to -491.75; RII = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.09 to 1.63) and days off (SII=-0.46, 95%CI: -0.62 to -0.30; RII = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.05 to 1.46). The findings highlight significant socioeconomic disparities in malaria-related outcomes across the studied districts, emphasizing the need for targeted public health interventions to address inequities. By prioritizing equity-focused policies, such as enhanced access to prevention and treatment, Tanzania can make strides toward more inclusive malaria control and health system strengthening, particularly for the most vulnerable populations. Furthermore, the use of SII and RII offered a nuanced understanding of health disparities across the socioeconomic spectrum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26462-w
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic health equity with malaria burden: quantifying slope (Relative) index of inequity in malaria infection outcomes in the Southeastern-coastal Tanzania

Longsheng Liu, Yeromin P. Mlacha, Shenning Lu, Shan Lv et al.
BMC Public Health
Malaria Research and Control
article

Socioeconomic health equity with malaria burden: quantifying slope (Relative) index of inequity in malaria infection outcomes in the Southeastern-coastal Tanzania

Longsheng Liu, Yeromin P. Mlacha, Shenning Lu, Shan Lv, Wei Ding, Xiao-Nong Zhou, Prosper P. Chaki, Salim Abdulla, Duoquan Wang, Zhebin Wang, Shizhu Li
article en

Abstract

Malaria remains a significant public health challenge in Tanzania, with socioeconomic factors playing crucial roles in disease outcomes. While previous studies have explored the relationship between socioeconomic status and malaria infection, quantitative assessment of equity condition in malaria outcomes remains understudied. This study innovatively applies Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and Relative Index of Inequality (RII) to quantify the equity conditions between socioeconomics and malaria burden in three Districts located in the Southeastern coast of Tanzania. Data from the baseline survey of the China-Tanzania Demonstration Project on Malaria Control conducted in 2019 were analyzed. Key variables included: (1) socioeconomic status quantified through Principal Component Analysis incorporating household infrastructure, asset ownership, and social potential; (2) malaria infection outcomes, including blood test results, treatment costs, and days absent from work/education (days off). Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to assess socioeconomic impacts, while SII and RII were calculated to measure health equity conditions across socioeconomic strata in three districts of Rufiji, Kilwa, and Kibiti. Higher socioeconomic status was associated with a lower risk of malaria infection (OR = 0.9975, 95% CI: 0.9972–0.9978), lower treatment costs (coefficient = -3.13, P < 0.05), and fewer days off work (coefficient = -0.0017, P < 0.05). Rufiji district demonstrated the most significant socioeconomic equality in malaria infection risk (SII=-12.62%, 95%CI: -17.19% to -8.06%; RII = 1.28, 95%CI: 1.12 to 1.55), treatment cost (SII = 837.769, 95%CI: -1182.44 to -491.75; RII = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.09 to 1.63) and days off (SII=-0.46, 95%CI: -0.62 to -0.30; RII = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.05 to 1.46). The findings highlight significant socioeconomic disparities in malaria-related outcomes across the studied districts, emphasizing the need for targeted public health interventions to address inequities. By prioritizing equity-focused policies, such as enhanced access to prevention and treatment, Tanzania can make strides toward more inclusive malaria control and health system strengthening, particularly for the most vulnerable populations. Furthermore, the use of SII and RII offered a nuanced understanding of health disparities across the socioeconomic spectrum.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
Ifakara Health Institute (TZ), National Institute for Parasitic Diseases (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Peking University (CN), Cognition Behaviour Technology (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.