Derivation of a Point of Departure using NAMs for application in Quantitative Risk Assessment of fragrance materials

Skin sensitization is a key endpoint for the safety assessment of topical consumer products. Ingredients with the potential to act as skin sensitizers differ markedly in their threshold for induction but can be used safely if their potency is characterized and exposure remains within an appropriate margin of safety. To this end, the fragrance industry co-developed Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) which starts with the No-Expected-Sensitization-Induction-Level (NESIL). Historically, QRA relies on a weight of evidence approach based on animal data, human confirmatory tests and read across. To allow an approach based solely on New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), the International Dialogue for the Evaluation of Allergens (IDEA) initiative, developed an extended Reference Chemical Potency List (RCPL) integrating human and animal data to derive potency values (PV). Here, we use PVs to evaluate the suitability of quantitative NAMs, including Defined Approaches (DAs), to derive a Point-of-Departure (NAM-PoD) for skin sensitization potency assessment. Evaluation of NAM-PoD derived by SARA-ICE DA, Regression DA and GARDskin dose-response assay (GSDR), indicates that the sensitization potency of fragrance chemicals can be reliably predicted using each approach. Through comparison of NAM-PoDs with in vivo human sensitization thresholds, NAM-specific adjustment factors were derived to convert NAM-PoDs into NAM-NESILs for QRA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2026.106052
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
54.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Derivation of a Point of Departure using NAMs for application in Quantitative Risk Assessment of fragrance materials

A.M. Api, Andreas Natsch, Petra Kern, Peter Griem et al.
1 citations
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
54.66
article

Derivation of a Point of Departure using NAMs for application in Quantitative Risk Assessment of fragrance materials

A.M. Api, Andreas Natsch, Petra Kern, Peter Griem, Matthias Vey, Amaia Irizar, James Winfred Bridges, Isabelle Lee, Ian Kimber
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Skin sensitization is a key endpoint for the safety assessment of topical consumer products. Ingredients with the potential to act as skin sensitizers differ markedly in their threshold for induction but can be used safely if their potency is characterized and exposure remains within an appropriate margin of safety. To this end, the fragrance industry co-developed Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) which starts with the No-Expected-Sensitization-Induction-Level (NESIL). Historically, QRA relies on a weight of evidence approach based on animal data, human confirmatory tests and read across. To allow an approach based solely on New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), the International Dialogue for the Evaluation of Allergens (IDEA) initiative, developed an extended Reference Chemical Potency List (RCPL) integrating human and animal data to derive potency values (PV). Here, we use PVs to evaluate the suitability of quantitative NAMs, including Defined Approaches (DAs), to derive a Point-of-Departure (NAM-PoD) for skin sensitization potency assessment. Evaluation of NAM-PoD derived by SARA-ICE DA, Regression DA and GARDskin dose-response assay (GSDR), indicates that the sensitization potency of fragrance chemicals can be reliably predicted using each approach. Through comparison of NAM-PoDs with in vivo human sensitization thresholds, NAM-specific adjustment factors were derived to convert NAM-PoDs into NAM-NESILs for QRA.

Regulatory Toxicology and PharmacologyVol. 167
Givaudan (Switzerland) (CH), Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (US), University of Surrey (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Procter & Gamble (Belgium) (BE), The Geneva Association (CH), Symrise (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
54.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.