Estimation of fragment size distribution using existing models and modification for underground blasting in diverse geological condition

Abstract Background Accurate prediction of pre-blast fragment size distribution is critical, as it directly influences the downstream operations such as loading, hauling, and grinding. This study evaluates a modified Kuz–Ram model and its suitability in tunnel blasting to predict the size distribution of fragments. Methods The prediction of mean fragment size (X 50 ), uniformity index (n), and characteristic size (X C ) are evaluated in three different types of rock masses: dolomite, augen gneiss, and phyllite. The model provides reasonable estimation for dolomite and phyllite but significantly underestimates the fragment size in augen gneiss. Results The predicted values of mean fragment size exhibit a large deviation from actual measurements, with a mean absolute deviation of 18.25 cm and a root mean square deviation of 18.29 cm in augen gneiss. This deviation suggests that the accuracy of the modified Kuz–Ram model decreases with increasing Rock Mass Rating (RMR), Geological Strength Index (GSI), and joint spacing values. Notably, the value of these parameters are higher in the augen gneiss than in the other two rock types. The multiple non-linear regression analysis was employed to refine the model for tunnel blasting. The resulting model significantly reduces the error margins from over 60% to approximately 10%. Similarly, correlation equations between predicted and actual measurements of uniformity index and characteristic size were developed, with a correlation coefficient (R 2 ) of 0.71 or higher. A novel empirical relationship correlating X 50 with RMR, GSI, and average joint spacing was established with an R 2 value of 0.70 or greater for the various rock masses. Conclusion These newly developed equations are appropriate not only for this specific rock type but for other types of rock masses with similar properties. The findings of this study offer a more practical tool for underground blasting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoenvironmental Disasters
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-026-00366-8
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of fragment size distribution using existing models and modification for underground blasting in diverse geological condition

Suman Panthee, Ajita Bhandari, Ajay Tomar, Saroj Shrestha
Geoenvironmental Disasters
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Estimation of fragment size distribution using existing models and modification for underground blasting in diverse geological condition

Suman Panthee, Ajita Bhandari, Ajay Tomar, Saroj Shrestha
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Accurate prediction of pre-blast fragment size distribution is critical, as it directly influences the downstream operations such as loading, hauling, and grinding. This study evaluates a modified Kuz–Ram model and its suitability in tunnel blasting to predict the size distribution of fragments. Methods The prediction of mean fragment size (X 50 ), uniformity index (n), and characteristic size (X C ) are evaluated in three different types of rock masses: dolomite, augen gneiss, and phyllite. The model provides reasonable estimation for dolomite and phyllite but significantly underestimates the fragment size in augen gneiss. Results The predicted values of mean fragment size exhibit a large deviation from actual measurements, with a mean absolute deviation of 18.25 cm and a root mean square deviation of 18.29 cm in augen gneiss. This deviation suggests that the accuracy of the modified Kuz–Ram model decreases with increasing Rock Mass Rating (RMR), Geological Strength Index (GSI), and joint spacing values. Notably, the value of these parameters are higher in the augen gneiss than in the other two rock types. The multiple non-linear regression analysis was employed to refine the model for tunnel blasting. The resulting model significantly reduces the error margins from over 60% to approximately 10%. Similarly, correlation equations between predicted and actual measurements of uniformity index and characteristic size were developed, with a correlation coefficient (R 2 ) of 0.71 or higher. A novel empirical relationship correlating X 50 with RMR, GSI, and average joint spacing was established with an R 2 value of 0.70 or greater for the various rock masses. Conclusion These newly developed equations are appropriate not only for this specific rock type but for other types of rock masses with similar properties. The findings of this study offer a more practical tool for underground blasting.

Geoenvironmental DisastersVol. 13(1)
Tribhuvan University (NP), Hydro Tasmania (AU), South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.