From Bench to Bedside: Ethical and Clinical Best Practices for Genome Editing Applications

Genome editing (GE) has transformed medicine by allowing precise changes to DNA, offering potential treatments for a range of inherited and acquired disorders. Several technologies support these advances, including zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based systems, of which the latter has emerged as the most accessible, versatile, and popular. While GE holds great promise, its clinical use requires careful attention to safety, ethics and regulatory standards. Inadvertent on- and off-target DNA alterations and unintended modification of non-target cells pose major technical challenges, while bioethical considerations and the need for harmonized safety standards create regulatory challenges. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA), as regulatory agencies for key advanced therapy markets, provide detailed guidance on these aspects, emphasizing rigorous preclinical testing, patient monitoring, ethical consent, and compliance with legal frameworks. This concise review summarizes what is currently published in the scientific literature and recommended by regulatory agencies, providing an overview of the responsible clinical application of GE, with emphasis on patient safety, adherence to regulatory guidance, and ethical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031484
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Bench to Bedside: Ethical and Clinical Best Practices for Genome Editing Applications

Alessia Cavazza, Karim Benabdellah, L. Montoliu, Federica Zinghirino et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

From Bench to Bedside: Ethical and Clinical Best Practices for Genome Editing Applications

Alessia Cavazza, Karim Benabdellah, L. Montoliu, Federica Zinghirino, Erden ATİLLA, María Ortiz-Bueno, Yonglun Luo, Carsten W. Lederer, Pilar Puig Serra, Kyriaki Paschoudi
article en

Abstract

Genome editing (GE) has transformed medicine by allowing precise changes to DNA, offering potential treatments for a range of inherited and acquired disorders. Several technologies support these advances, including zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based systems, of which the latter has emerged as the most accessible, versatile, and popular. While GE holds great promise, its clinical use requires careful attention to safety, ethics and regulatory standards. Inadvertent on- and off-target DNA alterations and unintended modification of non-target cells pose major technical challenges, while bioethical considerations and the need for harmonized safety standards create regulatory challenges. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA), as regulatory agencies for key advanced therapy markets, provide detailed guidance on these aspects, emphasizing rigorous preclinical testing, patient monitoring, ethical consent, and compliance with legal frameworks. This concise review summarizes what is currently published in the scientific literature and recommended by regulatory agencies, providing an overview of the responsible clinical application of GE, with emphasis on patient safety, adherence to regulatory guidance, and ethical practice.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 27(3)
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Steno Diabetes Centers (DK), University of Miami (US), Aarhus University (DK), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Biochemical Society (GB), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (ES), Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (ES), Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (ES), Pfizer-University of Granada-Junta de Andalucía Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research (ES), G. Papanikolaou General Hospital (GR), Institute of Infection and Immunity (CA), University College London (GB), Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics (CY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.