Crimes as Status Violations: Conceptualising Bipolar Duties in Criminal Law

Abstract In this article, I would like to map out a path towards a relational account of criminal wrongdoing that is as comprehensive as possible. Specifically, I argue that crimes affecting individuals involve the violation of intersubjective, bipolar duties. In this regard, I will directly address the prevailing understanding of crimes as impersonal wrongs, which I consider an obstacle to this project (1): I will demonstrate how it is conceptually feasible to move beyond this ‘impersonal’ paradigm towards a ‘relational’ one (2). This shift is not merely theoretical: bipolar duties and relational wrongs are, in fact, embedded in the way substantive criminal law functions (3). Importantly, this does not imply a loss of the public dimension of crime, but rather its enrichment through an intersubjective dimension of wrongdoing (4). Finally, I will propose potential avenues for future research within the framework of a relational paradigm in criminal law theory (5).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminal Law and Philosophy
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-025-09788-1
Primary Topic
Free Will and Agency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crimes as Status Violations: Conceptualising Bipolar Duties in Criminal Law

Philipp-Alexander Hirsch
Criminal Law and Philosophy
Free Will and Agency
article

Crimes as Status Violations: Conceptualising Bipolar Duties in Criminal Law

Philipp-Alexander Hirsch
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this article, I would like to map out a path towards a relational account of criminal wrongdoing that is as comprehensive as possible. Specifically, I argue that crimes affecting individuals involve the violation of intersubjective, bipolar duties. In this regard, I will directly address the prevailing understanding of crimes as impersonal wrongs, which I consider an obstacle to this project (1): I will demonstrate how it is conceptually feasible to move beyond this ‘impersonal’ paradigm towards a ‘relational’ one (2). This shift is not merely theoretical: bipolar duties and relational wrongs are, in fact, embedded in the way substantive criminal law functions (3). Importantly, this does not imply a loss of the public dimension of crime, but rather its enrichment through an intersubjective dimension of wrongdoing (4). Finally, I will propose potential avenues for future research within the framework of a relational paradigm in criminal law theory (5).

Criminal Law and Philosophy
Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Free Will and Agency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crimes as Status Violations: Conceptualising Bipolar Duties in Criminal Law — Philipp-Alexander Hirsch · Criminal Law and Philosophy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS