Prospective Evaluation of Cytology, CINtec® and PD-L1 for the Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Single-Center Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of cervical cytology, CINtec<sup>®</sup> (p16/Ki-67 dual staining), and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, individually and in combination with high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) testing, for identifying histologically confirmed cervical lesions ranging from CIN1 to invasive carcinoma. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study including 114 patients who underwent cervical cytology, CINtec<sup>®</sup>, PD-L1 staining, HPV genotyping, and histopathologic confirmation at a tertiary clinical center between September 2024 and September 2025. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and ROC performance were calculated for each test across lesion categories. Multivariable logistic regression models incorporating HR-HPV status were used to assess added predictive value. <b>Results</b>: All tests showed poor performance for CIN1 (cytology AUC 0.488; CINtec<sup>®</sup> 0.374; PD-L1 0.366). Diagnostic accuracy improved markedly with lesion severity. For CIN3, CINtec<sup>®</sup> demonstrated the highest discriminative ability (AUC 0.826), with cytology and PD-L1 also performing well (AUC 0.820 and 0.753). Cytology achieved the strongest ROC performance for CIN2+ (AUC 0.937), CIN3+ (0.913), and invasive carcinoma (0.887). PD-L1 consistently showed lower accuracy across categories. Cytology + HR-HPV demonstrated the highest AUC across all lesion categories. <b>Conclusions</b>: Cytology and CINtec<sup>®</sup> exhibited strong diagnostic accuracy for high-grade lesions, while PD-L1 showed limited utility as an independent screening marker. Combining cytology with HR-HPV testing enhanced predictive performance across all lesion categories. These findings support the continued use of cytology-based triage and highlight CINtec<sup>®</sup> as a valuable adjunct for high-grade disease detection. Because this study used a high-prevalence referral cohort, specificity may be overestimated and not representative of population-based screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031171
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospective Evaluation of Cytology, CINtec® and PD-L1 for the Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Single-Center Study

Oancea Olimpia Elena Mihaela, Ludmila Lozneanu, Ana Maria Grigore, Razvan Mihai Popovici et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Prospective Evaluation of Cytology, CINtec® and PD-L1 for the Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Single-Center Study

Oancea Olimpia Elena Mihaela, Ludmila Lozneanu, Ana Maria Grigore, Razvan Mihai Popovici, Ingrid-Andrada Vasilache, D Andronic, Alexandru Hamod, Mihaela Grigore, Ramona-Gabriela Ursu, Manuela Ciocoiu
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of cervical cytology, CINtec<sup>®</sup> (p16/Ki-67 dual staining), and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, individually and in combination with high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) testing, for identifying histologically confirmed cervical lesions ranging from CIN1 to invasive carcinoma. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study including 114 patients who underwent cervical cytology, CINtec<sup>®</sup>, PD-L1 staining, HPV genotyping, and histopathologic confirmation at a tertiary clinical center between September 2024 and September 2025. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and ROC performance were calculated for each test across lesion categories. Multivariable logistic regression models incorporating HR-HPV status were used to assess added predictive value. <b>Results</b>: All tests showed poor performance for CIN1 (cytology AUC 0.488; CINtec<sup>®</sup> 0.374; PD-L1 0.366). Diagnostic accuracy improved markedly with lesion severity. For CIN3, CINtec<sup>®</sup> demonstrated the highest discriminative ability (AUC 0.826), with cytology and PD-L1 also performing well (AUC 0.820 and 0.753). Cytology achieved the strongest ROC performance for CIN2+ (AUC 0.937), CIN3+ (0.913), and invasive carcinoma (0.887). PD-L1 consistently showed lower accuracy across categories. Cytology + HR-HPV demonstrated the highest AUC across all lesion categories. <b>Conclusions</b>: Cytology and CINtec<sup>®</sup> exhibited strong diagnostic accuracy for high-grade lesions, while PD-L1 showed limited utility as an independent screening marker. Combining cytology with HR-HPV testing enhanced predictive performance across all lesion categories. These findings support the continued use of cytology-based triage and highlight CINtec<sup>®</sup> as a valuable adjunct for high-grade disease detection. Because this study used a high-prevalence referral cohort, specificity may be overestimated and not representative of population-based screening.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(3)
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.