Prospective Evaluation of Cytology, CINtec® and PD-L1 for the Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Single-Center Study
<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of cervical cytology, CINtec<sup>®</sup> (p16/Ki-67 dual staining), and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, individually and in combination with high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) testing, for identifying histologically confirmed cervical lesions ranging from CIN1 to invasive carcinoma. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study including 114 patients who underwent cervical cytology, CINtec<sup>®</sup>, PD-L1 staining, HPV genotyping, and histopathologic confirmation at a tertiary clinical center between September 2024 and September 2025. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and ROC performance were calculated for each test across lesion categories. Multivariable logistic regression models incorporating HR-HPV status were used to assess added predictive value. <b>Results</b>: All tests showed poor performance for CIN1 (cytology AUC 0.488; CINtec<sup>®</sup> 0.374; PD-L1 0.366). Diagnostic accuracy improved markedly with lesion severity. For CIN3, CINtec<sup>®</sup> demonstrated the highest discriminative ability (AUC 0.826), with cytology and PD-L1 also performing well (AUC 0.820 and 0.753). Cytology achieved the strongest ROC performance for CIN2+ (AUC 0.937), CIN3+ (0.913), and invasive carcinoma (0.887). PD-L1 consistently showed lower accuracy across categories. Cytology + HR-HPV demonstrated the highest AUC across all lesion categories. <b>Conclusions</b>: Cytology and CINtec<sup>®</sup> exhibited strong diagnostic accuracy for high-grade lesions, while PD-L1 showed limited utility as an independent screening marker. Combining cytology with HR-HPV testing enhanced predictive performance across all lesion categories. These findings support the continued use of cytology-based triage and highlight CINtec<sup>®</sup> as a valuable adjunct for high-grade disease detection. Because this study used a high-prevalence referral cohort, specificity may be overestimated and not representative of population-based screening.
Authors
- Oancea Olimpia Elena Mihaela
- Ludmila Lozneanu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3994-6579)
- Ana Maria Grigore (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8580-5489)
- Razvan Mihai Popovici (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2498-357X)
- Ingrid-Andrada Vasilache (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-392X)
- D Andronic
- Alexandru Hamod
- Mihaela Grigore
- Ramona-Gabriela Ursu
- Manuela Ciocoiu
Institutions
- Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
- Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Published
- 2026-02-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031171
- Primary Topic
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00