Ensuring Safe Newborn Delivery Through Standards: A Scoping Review of Technologies Aligned with Healthcare Accreditation and Regulatory Frameworks

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Safe delivery and correct identification of newborns are critical aspects of healthcare systems globally. The accreditation of healthcare and standards regulation significantly promotes the adoption of modern technologies to address risks related to infant abduction and misidentification. The effectiveness and extent of these mandates vary across settings and countries. Therefore, this study aims to map and explore modern technologies used for safe newborn delivery and correct identification aligned with healthcare accreditation and regulatory frameworks. <b>Methods:</b> This review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The Problem, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) framework was employed to facilitate the development of the research question. This study examined studies reporting technologies such as radio frequency identification (RFID), biometric identification, and real-time monitoring across healthcare settings for infant protection through the Normalization Process Theory (NPT). Among three databases and search engines (PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science). The risk of bias for each study was assessed using the AACODS Checklist, SQUIRE 2.0 Checklist, TIDieR Checklist, and JBI tools. <b>Results:</b> Out of 8753 records, only 27 reports were eligible to be included in this review. The most frequently reported technologies were RFID systems (11 studies, 37.9%) and biometric systems such as footprint and facial recognition (6 studies, 20.7%). Despite strong technological potential, many healthcare institutions struggled with the adoption of infant protection technologies. Accreditation systems among the high-resource settings actively mandate advanced technologies and support the integration of staff training and simulation drills. Comparably, middle- and low-income regions usually face challenges related to regulatory enforcement, infrastructure, staff readiness, and limited adoption of modern technologies. <b>Conclusions:</b> Accreditation and standards development are critical catalysts for the adoption of modern infant protection technology. Standards must be comprehensible, adaptable, and supported by investment in human resources and infrastructure. Future regulation must focus on strengthening enforcement, continuous quality improvement, and capacity building to achieve sustainable protection across the world.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14030377
Primary Topic
Neonatal skin health care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensuring Safe Newborn Delivery Through Standards: A Scoping Review of Technologies Aligned with Healthcare Accreditation and Regulatory Frameworks

Khalid Alkhurayji, Abdallah Alsuhaimi
Healthcare
Neonatal skin health care
article

Ensuring Safe Newborn Delivery Through Standards: A Scoping Review of Technologies Aligned with Healthcare Accreditation and Regulatory Frameworks

Khalid Alkhurayji, Abdallah Alsuhaimi
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Safe delivery and correct identification of newborns are critical aspects of healthcare systems globally. The accreditation of healthcare and standards regulation significantly promotes the adoption of modern technologies to address risks related to infant abduction and misidentification. The effectiveness and extent of these mandates vary across settings and countries. Therefore, this study aims to map and explore modern technologies used for safe newborn delivery and correct identification aligned with healthcare accreditation and regulatory frameworks. <b>Methods:</b> This review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The Problem, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) framework was employed to facilitate the development of the research question. This study examined studies reporting technologies such as radio frequency identification (RFID), biometric identification, and real-time monitoring across healthcare settings for infant protection through the Normalization Process Theory (NPT). Among three databases and search engines (PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science). The risk of bias for each study was assessed using the AACODS Checklist, SQUIRE 2.0 Checklist, TIDieR Checklist, and JBI tools. <b>Results:</b> Out of 8753 records, only 27 reports were eligible to be included in this review. The most frequently reported technologies were RFID systems (11 studies, 37.9%) and biometric systems such as footprint and facial recognition (6 studies, 20.7%). Despite strong technological potential, many healthcare institutions struggled with the adoption of infant protection technologies. Accreditation systems among the high-resource settings actively mandate advanced technologies and support the integration of staff training and simulation drills. Comparably, middle- and low-income regions usually face challenges related to regulatory enforcement, infrastructure, staff readiness, and limited adoption of modern technologies. <b>Conclusions:</b> Accreditation and standards development are critical catalysts for the adoption of modern infant protection technology. Standards must be comprehensible, adaptable, and supported by investment in human resources and infrastructure. Future regulation must focus on strengthening enforcement, continuous quality improvement, and capacity building to achieve sustainable protection across the world.

HealthcareVol. 14(3)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Neonatal skin health care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.