SHOULD PHYSICS BE A COMPULSORY SUBJECT FOR SCHOOL STUDENTS OR AN OPTIONAL CHOICE?

The role of physics in school education has long been a subject of debate among educators, parents, and policymakers. While some argue that physics should remain a compulsory subject due to its fundamental importance in understanding the natural world and developing critical thinking skills, others believe that it should be offered as an optional subject to accommodate students’ diverse interests and abilities. This article explores both perspectives by analyzing the educational, cognitive, and social benefits of compulsory physics education, as well as the challenges and limitations it may impose on students. The discussion also considers modern educational needs, labor market demands, and student motivation. Based on the analysis, the article suggests a balanced approach that maintains physics as a core subject while allowing flexibility in curriculum depth and specialization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18456652
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SHOULD PHYSICS BE A COMPULSORY SUBJECT FOR SCHOOL STUDENTS OR AN OPTIONAL CHOICE?

Nasiba Zuvaydulloyevna Fayzullayeva, Khurshida Erkinjanovna Akhmedova
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

SHOULD PHYSICS BE A COMPULSORY SUBJECT FOR SCHOOL STUDENTS OR AN OPTIONAL CHOICE?

Nasiba Zuvaydulloyevna Fayzullayeva, Khurshida Erkinjanovna Akhmedova
article en

Abstract

The role of physics in school education has long been a subject of debate among educators, parents, and policymakers. While some argue that physics should remain a compulsory subject due to its fundamental importance in understanding the natural world and developing critical thinking skills, others believe that it should be offered as an optional subject to accommodate students’ diverse interests and abilities. This article explores both perspectives by analyzing the educational, cognitive, and social benefits of compulsory physics education, as well as the challenges and limitations it may impose on students. The discussion also considers modern educational needs, labor market demands, and student motivation. Based on the analysis, the article suggests a balanced approach that maintains physics as a core subject while allowing flexibility in curriculum depth and specialization.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Lyceum College (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SHOULD PHYSICS BE A COMPULSORY SUBJECT FOR SCHOOL STUDENTS OR AN OPTIONAL CHOICE? — Nasiba Zuvaydulloyevna Fayzullayeva, Khurshida Erkinjanovna Akhmedova · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS