S08-2: Monitoring Physical Activity Policies at the Subnational Level: A Review of Existing Tools

Purpose: The subnational level plays a key role in physical activity (PA) promotion, e.g. by developing policies across different sectors and/or by implementing national PA policies. However, research on PA policy monitoring focuses mainly on the national level; to close this gap, new monitoring tools have been developed that are specifically designed for the local or regional level. This study aimed to identify and examine existing PA policy monitoring tools for the subnational level and to determine their key elements. Methods: As PA policy monitoring tools developed by governments are not necessarily described in scientific studies, a systematic grey literature review was conducted. Steps included: (1) reference screening of existing reviews, (2) grey literature search in the data bases OpenGrey and Startpage, and (3) expert consultation. Tools were included if they were focused on the subnational level and PA policies. Key characteristics of the tools were extracted and analysed systematically (e.g. scope, data sources, scale, method of data collection, number of items, content). Results: This review identified 17 tools that monitor, assess, or benchmark PA policies at sub-national level. Preliminary results indicate that nine of these tools were developed by researchers, while eight can be described as government-driven. The methodology of data collection differs; while the majority of tools are based on surveys, some utilise desk-research in combination with expert consultation. Most tools were tested in a single country. Moreover, the number of indicators varied widely, from as few as eight to over 280. Conclusion: The review identified a considerable variation in methodological approaches for subnational PA policy monitoring, from in-depth qualitative case studies to large scale nationwide surveys that take place on a regular basis. As many tools were developed in a specific national context, their transferability to other countries is often unclear. Support/Funding Source: This is part of the project IMPAQT, which is funded from Ireland, Health Research Board; Poland, National Centre for Research and Development; Germany, Federal Ministry of Education and Research; The Netherlands, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; Romania, Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding; Lithuania, Research Council of Lithuania, under the umbrella of the Partnership Fostering a European Research Area for Health (ERA4Health) (GA N° 101095426 of the EU Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33607/bjshs.v5isupplement.2019
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S08-2: Monitoring Physical Activity Policies at the Subnational Level: A Review of Existing Tools

Antonina Tcymbal, Karim Abu‐Omar, Peter Gelius, Sven Messing et al.
Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences
Physical Activity and Health
article

S08-2: Monitoring Physical Activity Policies at the Subnational Level: A Review of Existing Tools

Antonina Tcymbal, Karim Abu‐Omar, Peter Gelius, Sven Messing, Aurélie Van Hoye, Anna Gobis, Joanna Żukowska, Joanna Wachnicka, Fleur Heuvelman, Leonie Birkholz, Rasa Jankauskienė, Peter Laszlo, Catherine Woods, Nicolette R. Den Braver, Petru Sandu
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The subnational level plays a key role in physical activity (PA) promotion, e.g. by developing policies across different sectors and/or by implementing national PA policies. However, research on PA policy monitoring focuses mainly on the national level; to close this gap, new monitoring tools have been developed that are specifically designed for the local or regional level. This study aimed to identify and examine existing PA policy monitoring tools for the subnational level and to determine their key elements. Methods: As PA policy monitoring tools developed by governments are not necessarily described in scientific studies, a systematic grey literature review was conducted. Steps included: (1) reference screening of existing reviews, (2) grey literature search in the data bases OpenGrey and Startpage, and (3) expert consultation. Tools were included if they were focused on the subnational level and PA policies. Key characteristics of the tools were extracted and analysed systematically (e.g. scope, data sources, scale, method of data collection, number of items, content). Results: This review identified 17 tools that monitor, assess, or benchmark PA policies at sub-national level. Preliminary results indicate that nine of these tools were developed by researchers, while eight can be described as government-driven. The methodology of data collection differs; while the majority of tools are based on surveys, some utilise desk-research in combination with expert consultation. Most tools were tested in a single country. Moreover, the number of indicators varied widely, from as few as eight to over 280. Conclusion: The review identified a considerable variation in methodological approaches for subnational PA policy monitoring, from in-depth qualitative case studies to large scale nationwide surveys that take place on a regular basis. As many tools were developed in a specific national context, their transferability to other countries is often unclear. Support/Funding Source: This is part of the project IMPAQT, which is funded from Ireland, Health Research Board; Poland, National Centre for Research and Development; Germany, Federal Ministry of Education and Research; The Netherlands, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; Romania, Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding; Lithuania, Research Council of Lithuania, under the umbrella of the Partnership Fostering a European Research Area for Health (ERA4Health) (GA N° 101095426 of the EU Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme).

Baltic Journal of Sport and Health SciencesVol. 5(Supplement)
Gdańsk University of Technology (PL), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University of Limerick (IE), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), Klaipėda University (LT), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Lausanne (CH)
ZonMw, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.