Governing the Olympic Winter Games: Reflections from Canada

As we celebrate 100 years of the Olympic Winter Games, it is an appropriate time to reflect on these Games and particularly on their governance. In this paper, I examine the governance of the Olympic Winter Games from a Canadian perspective and reflect on why there have been multiple failed bids and what it means for the Olympic Winter Games and their owner, the International Olympic Committee, moving forward. From the previous studies on Canadian Olympic (Winter) Games governance and documentary evidence from the more recent bid attempts, I show how the structure and processes, institutions and procedures, and multijurisdictional and multisectoral nature of the Games in Canada allowed the country, in the past, to be innovative in its governance and the actors brought onboard, such as the Four Host First Nations. However, current national realities (e.g., reconciliation efforts with the Indigenous communities) have challenged established (Western colonial) ways of doing and led, at least in part, to the failed bids. Yet, the Indigenous way of governing may be a light of hope for the International Olympic Committee as it struggles with a lacklustre reputation and its need to address the environmental sustainability of the Olympic Winter Games.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2025002/pdf
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing the Olympic Winter Games: Reflections from Canada

Milena M. Parent
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Governing the Olympic Winter Games: Reflections from Canada

Milena M. Parent
article en

Abstract

As we celebrate 100 years of the Olympic Winter Games, it is an appropriate time to reflect on these Games and particularly on their governance. In this paper, I examine the governance of the Olympic Winter Games from a Canadian perspective and reflect on why there have been multiple failed bids and what it means for the Olympic Winter Games and their owner, the International Olympic Committee, moving forward. From the previous studies on Canadian Olympic (Winter) Games governance and documentary evidence from the more recent bid attempts, I show how the structure and processes, institutions and procedures, and multijurisdictional and multisectoral nature of the Games in Canada allowed the country, in the past, to be innovative in its governance and the actors brought onboard, such as the Four Host First Nations. However, current national realities (e.g., reconciliation efforts with the Indigenous communities) have challenged established (Western colonial) ways of doing and led, at least in part, to the failed bids. Yet, the Indigenous way of governing may be a light of hope for the International Olympic Committee as it struggles with a lacklustre reputation and its need to address the environmental sustainability of the Olympic Winter Games.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.