Circular advantage in global textile waste trade: geographic vs. nongeographic distances in a fragmented world

Abstract This study investigates the determinants of global textile waste trade by comparing the influence of traditional geographic distances with emerging nongeographic distances, including sustainability, resource intensity, and income disparities. Employing a cross-sectional gravity model framework for the year 2024, the analysis draws on bilateral trade data between the top 34 textile waste exporters and their importing partners. Findings reveal that while geographic distance remains statistically insignificant, nongeographic dimensions such as income and resource intensity distances play a critical role in explaining variation in trade volumes. This suggests a shift in global trade dynamics, where institutional and environmental asymmetries outweigh traditional physical distance. The study introduces the concept of “circular advantage” as a strategic lens to assess trade competitiveness in waste-related sectors. The implications are vital for trade and sustainability policymakers seeking to realign waste governance with circular economy goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Shipping and Trade
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-026-00229-3
Primary Topic
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circular advantage in global textile waste trade: geographic vs. nongeographic distances in a fragmented world

Sarah Elsayed Elsayed Elshazly, Saber Adly Shaker
Journal of Shipping and Trade
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
article

Circular advantage in global textile waste trade: geographic vs. nongeographic distances in a fragmented world

Sarah Elsayed Elsayed Elshazly, Saber Adly Shaker
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the determinants of global textile waste trade by comparing the influence of traditional geographic distances with emerging nongeographic distances, including sustainability, resource intensity, and income disparities. Employing a cross-sectional gravity model framework for the year 2024, the analysis draws on bilateral trade data between the top 34 textile waste exporters and their importing partners. Findings reveal that while geographic distance remains statistically insignificant, nongeographic dimensions such as income and resource intensity distances play a critical role in explaining variation in trade volumes. This suggests a shift in global trade dynamics, where institutional and environmental asymmetries outweigh traditional physical distance. The study introduces the concept of “circular advantage” as a strategic lens to assess trade competitiveness in waste-related sectors. The implications are vital for trade and sustainability policymakers seeking to realign waste governance with circular economy goals.

Journal of Shipping and TradeVol. 11(1)
Helwan University (EG)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Sustainable Industrial Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Circular advantage in global textile waste trade: geographic vs. nongeographic distances in a fragmented world — Sarah Elsayed Elsayed Elshazly, Saber Adly Shaker · Journal of Shipping and Trade (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS