Metrological Closure and Particle Spectrum in the Yin–Yang Model
“Metrological Closure and Particle Spectrum in the Yin–Yang Model” proposes the YY framework as an auditable constitutive system: instead of treating time as a primitive coordinate and particles as pointlike objects, YY defines the physical regime as discrete processing in the Now (ticks/slips) coupled to a registry domain in Yang, where relaxations, decays, and energetic excess become memory. Within this ontology, a particle is formalized as forced mode + locking; mass is interpreted as the inventory/latency cost of locking, while stability (lifetime) is the ability to maintain synchronization under the discrete clock. Validation is organized as metrological engineering: results are admitted into the “core” of the model only when they arise from an explicit chain from the minimal geometric kit and are accompanied by ledger accounting plus a residual audit (harness tests, ablations of key factors, and anti-cherry-picking batteries on sensitive observables). The SI is treated strictly as a translation layer (I/O), not as a foundation: dimensional constants enter only through declared bridges, preserving the closure logic for dimensionless targets. As a “signature panel” of the metrological closure, the manuscript reports: α = 0.007297352566842 with +2.97 ppb, Z₀ = 376.730313461 Ω with −0.55 ppb, μ₀ with −0.05 ppm, ε₀ with +0.003 ppm, and G = 6.6741063×10⁻¹¹ with −29 ppm (30-ppm target), using standard references (CODATA / NIST and Particle Data Group). The kernel is then confronted by families (leptons, neutrinos, mesons, baryons, and heavy bosons), with an operational SAFE/META/OVERRUN classification and explicit falsifiability criteria. Selected particle-level outputs reported in this work include the electron g-factor $g_e = 2.002319311639819$ with a +3.64 ppb residue against NIST, and the neutrino oscillation scales $\Delta m^2_{21} = 7.421\times10^{-5}\,\mathrm{eV}^2$ (-308 ppm, PASS) and $\Delta m^2_{32} = 2.306\times10^{-3}\,\mathrm{eV}^2$ (-5.67%, watchlist) against Particle Data Group conventions, with $\Sigma m_\nu = 0.05732\,\mathrm{eV}$ remaining below the commonly used cosmological bound ($<0.12\,\mathrm{eV}$). The electroweak sector is summarized by $\sin^2\theta_W(\overline{\mathrm{MS}})=0.2312030$ (-73 ppm; PASS), while the ``rupture/top'' criterion is satisfied by $\tau_{\mathrm{top}}\approx 5.25\times10^{-25}\,\mathrm{s}\ll \tau_{\mathrm{had}}\approx 3.0\times10^{-24}\,\mathrm{s}$, supporting the operational claim that the top does not hadronize. At the resonance level, the framework classifies the $W/Z$ as gate-type OVERRUN operators (with characteristic scales $m_W\approx 80.37\,\mathrm{GeV},\,\Gamma_W\approx 2.14\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $m_Z\approx 91.19\,\mathrm{GeV},\,\Gamma_Z\approx 2.50\,\mathrm{GeV}$) and the Higgs as a short multi-tick operator ($m_H\approx 125.25\,\mathrm{GeV},\,\Gamma_H\approx 3.7\,\mathrm{MeV}$).
Authors
- Leo Carlos Kerber
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-02-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18459097
- Primary Topic
- Biofield Effects and Biophysics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00