Metrological Closure and Particle Spectrum in the Yin–Yang Model

“Metrological Closure and Particle Spectrum in the Yin–Yang Model” proposes the YY framework as an auditable constitutive system: instead of treating time as a primitive coordinate and particles as pointlike objects, YY defines the physical regime as discrete processing in the Now (ticks/slips) coupled to a registry domain in Yang, where relaxations, decays, and energetic excess become memory. Within this ontology, a particle is formalized as forced mode + locking; mass is interpreted as the inventory/latency cost of locking, while stability (lifetime) is the ability to maintain synchronization under the discrete clock. Validation is organized as metrological engineering: results are admitted into the “core” of the model only when they arise from an explicit chain from the minimal geometric kit and are accompanied by ledger accounting plus a residual audit (harness tests, ablations of key factors, and anti-cherry-picking batteries on sensitive observables). The SI is treated strictly as a translation layer (I/O), not as a foundation: dimensional constants enter only through declared bridges, preserving the closure logic for dimensionless targets. As a “signature panel” of the metrological closure, the manuscript reports: α = 0.007297352566842 with +2.97 ppb, Z₀ = 376.730313461 Ω with −0.55 ppb, μ₀ with −0.05 ppm, ε₀ with +0.003 ppm, and G = 6.6741063×10⁻¹¹ with −29 ppm (30-ppm target), using standard references (CODATA / NIST and Particle Data Group). The kernel is then confronted by families (leptons, neutrinos, mesons, baryons, and heavy bosons), with an operational SAFE/META/OVERRUN classification and explicit falsifiability criteria. Selected particle-level outputs reported in this work include the electron g-factor $g_e = 2.002319311639819$ with a +3.64 ppb residue against NIST, and the neutrino oscillation scales $\Delta m^2_{21} = 7.421\times10^{-5}\,\mathrm{eV}^2$ (-308 ppm, PASS) and $\Delta m^2_{32} = 2.306\times10^{-3}\,\mathrm{eV}^2$ (-5.67%, watchlist) against Particle Data Group conventions, with $\Sigma m_\nu = 0.05732\,\mathrm{eV}$ remaining below the commonly used cosmological bound ($<0.12\,\mathrm{eV}$). The electroweak sector is summarized by $\sin^2\theta_W(\overline{\mathrm{MS}})=0.2312030$ (-73 ppm; PASS), while the ``rupture/top'' criterion is satisfied by $\tau_{\mathrm{top}}\approx 5.25\times10^{-25}\,\mathrm{s}\ll \tau_{\mathrm{had}}\approx 3.0\times10^{-24}\,\mathrm{s}$, supporting the operational claim that the top does not hadronize. At the resonance level, the framework classifies the $W/Z$ as gate-type OVERRUN operators (with characteristic scales $m_W\approx 80.37\,\mathrm{GeV},\,\Gamma_W\approx 2.14\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $m_Z\approx 91.19\,\mathrm{GeV},\,\Gamma_Z\approx 2.50\,\mathrm{GeV}$) and the Higgs as a short multi-tick operator ($m_H\approx 125.25\,\mathrm{GeV},\,\Gamma_H\approx 3.7\,\mathrm{MeV}$).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18459097
Primary Topic
Biofield Effects and Biophysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metrological Closure and Particle Spectrum in the Yin–Yang Model

Leo Carlos Kerber
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Biofield Effects and Biophysics
article

Metrological Closure and Particle Spectrum in the Yin–Yang Model

Leo Carlos Kerber
article en

Abstract

“Metrological Closure and Particle Spectrum in the Yin–Yang Model” proposes the YY framework as an auditable constitutive system: instead of treating time as a primitive coordinate and particles as pointlike objects, YY defines the physical regime as discrete processing in the Now (ticks/slips) coupled to a registry domain in Yang, where relaxations, decays, and energetic excess become memory. Within this ontology, a particle is formalized as forced mode + locking; mass is interpreted as the inventory/latency cost of locking, while stability (lifetime) is the ability to maintain synchronization under the discrete clock. Validation is organized as metrological engineering: results are admitted into the “core” of the model only when they arise from an explicit chain from the minimal geometric kit and are accompanied by ledger accounting plus a residual audit (harness tests, ablations of key factors, and anti-cherry-picking batteries on sensitive observables). The SI is treated strictly as a translation layer (I/O), not as a foundation: dimensional constants enter only through declared bridges, preserving the closure logic for dimensionless targets. As a “signature panel” of the metrological closure, the manuscript reports: α = 0.007297352566842 with +2.97 ppb, Z₀ = 376.730313461 Ω with −0.55 ppb, μ₀ with −0.05 ppm, ε₀ with +0.003 ppm, and G = 6.6741063×10⁻¹¹ with −29 ppm (30-ppm target), using standard references (CODATA / NIST and Particle Data Group). The kernel is then confronted by families (leptons, neutrinos, mesons, baryons, and heavy bosons), with an operational SAFE/META/OVERRUN classification and explicit falsifiability criteria. Selected particle-level outputs reported in this work include the electron g-factor $g_e = 2.002319311639819$ with a +3.64 ppb residue against NIST, and the neutrino oscillation scales $\Delta m^2_{21} = 7.421\times10^{-5}\,\mathrm{eV}^2$ (-308 ppm, PASS) and $\Delta m^2_{32} = 2.306\times10^{-3}\,\mathrm{eV}^2$ (-5.67%, watchlist) against Particle Data Group conventions, with $\Sigma m_\nu = 0.05732\,\mathrm{eV}$ remaining below the commonly used cosmological bound ($<0.12\,\mathrm{eV}$). The electroweak sector is summarized by $\sin^2\theta_W(\overline{\mathrm{MS}})=0.2312030$ (-73 ppm; PASS), while the ``rupture/top'' criterion is satisfied by $\tau_{\mathrm{top}}\approx 5.25\times10^{-25}\,\mathrm{s}\ll \tau_{\mathrm{had}}\approx 3.0\times10^{-24}\,\mathrm{s}$, supporting the operational claim that the top does not hadronize. At the resonance level, the framework classifies the $W/Z$ as gate-type OVERRUN operators (with characteristic scales $m_W\approx 80.37\,\mathrm{GeV},\,\Gamma_W\approx 2.14\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $m_Z\approx 91.19\,\mathrm{GeV},\,\Gamma_Z\approx 2.50\,\mathrm{GeV}$) and the Higgs as a short multi-tick operator ($m_H\approx 125.25\,\mathrm{GeV},\,\Gamma_H\approx 3.7\,\mathrm{MeV}$).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Biofield Effects and Biophysics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.