Are tariffs always bad for growth? Evidence from cross-sectoral analysis

Abstract With the advancement of communication and transportation technologies and the growing fragmentation of global production, the link between trade openness and economic growth has once again become a central but unresolved question. This study provides new evidence on this issue by employing a set of distinct tariff measures for both intermediate and final products. Unlike previous studies that rely on sector-level weighted averages or gross trade statistics, we calculate input and output tariffs at the product level using HS 6-digit codes and the EORA input-output tables, while also using both gross and value-added trade measures. The resulting dataset covers 11 sectors, nine manufacturing, mining, agriculture, and fishing, across 177 countries from 1990 to 2018, allowing for detailed consideration of country, sector, and partner-country heterogeneity. The empirical analysis proceeds in two stages: a sectoral growth model and an extended sectoral gravity model. The results show that both faced and imposed input tariffs significantly reduce sectoral value-added growth, although the effects vary considerably across countries, sectors, and trading partners. The negative impact of tariffs is particularly pronounced in agriculture, mining, and high-technology sectors when developing countries trade with developed partners. Conversely, imposed output tariffs appear to promote value-added growth in low-technology manufacturing sectors of developing countries, lending support to the import substitution argument. The extended gravity estimations further reveal a negative relationship between tariffs and bilateral forward linkages. Overall, our findings suggest that policymakers should design sector-specific trade strategies, such as reducing input tariffs in high-tech and agriculture/mining sectors and carefully designing output tariffs in low-tech manufacturing in developing countries to better capture the gains from international trade and foster economic growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Change and Restructuring
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-026-09966-8
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are tariffs always bad for growth? Evidence from cross-sectoral analysis

Pınar Tat, Halit Yanıkkaya, Abdullah Altun
Economic Change and Restructuring
Economic and Technological Innovation
article

Are tariffs always bad for growth? Evidence from cross-sectoral analysis

Pınar Tat, Halit Yanıkkaya, Abdullah Altun
article en

Abstract

Abstract With the advancement of communication and transportation technologies and the growing fragmentation of global production, the link between trade openness and economic growth has once again become a central but unresolved question. This study provides new evidence on this issue by employing a set of distinct tariff measures for both intermediate and final products. Unlike previous studies that rely on sector-level weighted averages or gross trade statistics, we calculate input and output tariffs at the product level using HS 6-digit codes and the EORA input-output tables, while also using both gross and value-added trade measures. The resulting dataset covers 11 sectors, nine manufacturing, mining, agriculture, and fishing, across 177 countries from 1990 to 2018, allowing for detailed consideration of country, sector, and partner-country heterogeneity. The empirical analysis proceeds in two stages: a sectoral growth model and an extended sectoral gravity model. The results show that both faced and imposed input tariffs significantly reduce sectoral value-added growth, although the effects vary considerably across countries, sectors, and trading partners. The negative impact of tariffs is particularly pronounced in agriculture, mining, and high-technology sectors when developing countries trade with developed partners. Conversely, imposed output tariffs appear to promote value-added growth in low-technology manufacturing sectors of developing countries, lending support to the import substitution argument. The extended gravity estimations further reveal a negative relationship between tariffs and bilateral forward linkages. Overall, our findings suggest that policymakers should design sector-specific trade strategies, such as reducing input tariffs in high-tech and agriculture/mining sectors and carefully designing output tariffs in low-tech manufacturing in developing countries to better capture the gains from international trade and foster economic growth.

Economic Change and RestructuringVol. 59(1)
Gebze Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Economic and Technological Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.