Comparison of Readiness for Primary Health Services Integration (A Case Study in Two Public Health Centers in Sragen Regency)

The Integration of Primary Health Care Services (IPHC) is an innovation by the Indonesian Ministry of Health to expand access and provide comprehensive, high-quality health services encompassing promotive, preventive, curative, rehabilitative, and palliative aspects. Introduced in mid-2024, with full adoption targeted by the end of 2024, this policy poses several challenges for public health centres, including inadequate facilities, the absence of standard operating procedures (SOPs), and a lack of cadre assessments. This study aims to compare IPHC readiness at public health centres, auxiliary health centres, and integrated health posts in urban and rural PHC, specifically, Karangmalang and Gesi PHCs. The research used a qualitative method with a descriptive approach and data collection techniques through in-depth interviews at two public health centres in Sragen Regency from August to October 2024. Informants were selected using purposive sampling, comprising four main informants and five triangulation informants. The findings show that urban PHC excels in terms of equipment, regulations, and task distribution. Both urban and rural PHCs exhibit similar levels of stakeholder support for IPHC, yet both remain underprepared regarding target groups and community readiness. In conclusion, urban PHCs are better prepared for IPHC implementation compared to rural PHCs. Gesi PHC is advised to strengthen internal coordination, finalizing the SOP, and divide task allocation clearly among staff.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202519300015/pdf
Primary Topic
Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Readiness for Primary Health Services Integration (A Case Study in Two Public Health Centers in Sragen Regency)

Annisa Salsabila Aprilianda, Eka Yunila Fatmasari, Nurhasmadiar Nandini
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
article

Comparison of Readiness for Primary Health Services Integration (A Case Study in Two Public Health Centers in Sragen Regency)

Annisa Salsabila Aprilianda, Eka Yunila Fatmasari, Nurhasmadiar Nandini
article en

Abstract

The Integration of Primary Health Care Services (IPHC) is an innovation by the Indonesian Ministry of Health to expand access and provide comprehensive, high-quality health services encompassing promotive, preventive, curative, rehabilitative, and palliative aspects. Introduced in mid-2024, with full adoption targeted by the end of 2024, this policy poses several challenges for public health centres, including inadequate facilities, the absence of standard operating procedures (SOPs), and a lack of cadre assessments. This study aims to compare IPHC readiness at public health centres, auxiliary health centres, and integrated health posts in urban and rural PHC, specifically, Karangmalang and Gesi PHCs. The research used a qualitative method with a descriptive approach and data collection techniques through in-depth interviews at two public health centres in Sragen Regency from August to October 2024. Informants were selected using purposive sampling, comprising four main informants and five triangulation informants. The findings show that urban PHC excels in terms of equipment, regulations, and task distribution. Both urban and rural PHCs exhibit similar levels of stakeholder support for IPHC, yet both remain underprepared regarding target groups and community readiness. In conclusion, urban PHCs are better prepared for IPHC implementation compared to rural PHCs. Gesi PHC is advised to strengthen internal coordination, finalizing the SOP, and divide task allocation clearly among staff.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.