States of development and application of genetic and genomic tools in aquaculture and conservation programs: a guide for strengthening dialogue among practitioners of aquaculture and genetics

Throughout all stages of fish conservation and aquaculture development, genetic and genomic approaches can be leveraged to enhance understanding of the diversity and complexity of these organisms, including the linkage between phenotype and genotype, and their adaptive and breeding potential. These approaches can inform processes ranging from the initial collection of wild broodstock to the ongoing use of genomic selection on domesticated lines. Due to the diversity in cultured fish species, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) commonly explore new species for culture, or work with species within a narrow regional conservation or commercial focus. These enterprises face obstacles in utilising genetic and genomic approaches due to development and implementation costs, specialised skill set requirements, and infrastructure and labour limitations; yet the benefits often outweigh these challenges. Choosing the best molecular genetic or genomic tools depends on programme goals and species, but small and medium enterprises may miss opportunities to acquire more information through their current approaches, or not realise what may be gained through modest investments in genomic tools. To provide better insight and promote discussion and collaboration between culturists and genomic practitioners, we define and describe five States of development and application of genetic and genomic tools frequently observed in aquaculture and conservation breeding programs. We characterise these tools, their general applications, and how current technologies allow programs to advance to higher States without following a sequential progression, a concept we refer to as “State skipping”. This document outlines the available molecular genetic and genomic tools, but does not cover animal breeding or the science behind it. Similarly, bioeconomic models are not included, although relative economic costs and benefits are highlighted. The technical considerations and limitations of various approaches are reviewed, along with available resources for those seeking further support in exploring genetic and genomic tools in breeding programmes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-06-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2025006/pdf
Primary Topic
Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

States of development and application of genetic and genomic tools in aquaculture and conservation programs: a guide for strengthening dialogue among practitioners of aquaculture and genetics

Tony Kess, Harri Vehviläinen, Brendan F. Wringe, Mark W. Coulson et al.
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Animal Genetics and Reproduction
article

States of development and application of genetic and genomic tools in aquaculture and conservation programs: a guide for strengthening dialogue among practitioners of aquaculture and genetics

Tony Kess, Harri Vehviläinen, Brendan F. Wringe, Mark W. Coulson, Federico C. F. Calboli, Monica F. Solberg, Pierre Boudry, Marine S.O. Brieuc, Catherine M. Purcell
article en

Abstract

Throughout all stages of fish conservation and aquaculture development, genetic and genomic approaches can be leveraged to enhance understanding of the diversity and complexity of these organisms, including the linkage between phenotype and genotype, and their adaptive and breeding potential. These approaches can inform processes ranging from the initial collection of wild broodstock to the ongoing use of genomic selection on domesticated lines. Due to the diversity in cultured fish species, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) commonly explore new species for culture, or work with species within a narrow regional conservation or commercial focus. These enterprises face obstacles in utilising genetic and genomic approaches due to development and implementation costs, specialised skill set requirements, and infrastructure and labour limitations; yet the benefits often outweigh these challenges. Choosing the best molecular genetic or genomic tools depends on programme goals and species, but small and medium enterprises may miss opportunities to acquire more information through their current approaches, or not realise what may be gained through modest investments in genomic tools. To provide better insight and promote discussion and collaboration between culturists and genomic practitioners, we define and describe five States of development and application of genetic and genomic tools frequently observed in aquaculture and conservation breeding programs. We characterise these tools, their general applications, and how current technologies allow programs to advance to higher States without following a sequential progression, a concept we refer to as “State skipping”. This document outlines the available molecular genetic and genomic tools, but does not cover animal breeding or the science behind it. Similarly, bioeconomic models are not included, although relative economic costs and benefits are highlighted. The technical considerations and limitations of various approaches are reviewed, along with available resources for those seeking further support in exploring genetic and genomic tools in breeding programmes.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Animal Genetics and Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.