Uncertainty Indicators as Key Predictors of Oil Volatility: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach

We forecast monthly crude oil volatility dynamics using an interpretable machine learning framework applied to a long sample period from 1986 to 2023, encompassing multiple economic cycles, including four NBER-defined recessions, and incorporating 140 macroeconomic and uncertainty variables. Tree-based models (Random Forest and XGBoost) deliver the strongest out-of-sample forecasting performance, though their relative advantage varies across economic regimes. Uncertainty indicators, rather than oil-specific fundamentals, are the most influential predictors, indicating that oil volatility is primarily shaped by broader uncertainty conditions. Time-varying interpretability analyses reveal that the superior performance of tree-based models stems from their ability to flexibly combine multiple signals, an insight not captured by static importance scores. Our results highlight the value of dynamic interpretability in understanding regime-dependent machine learning behavior and offer guidance for volatility modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Economics
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-11299-z
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty Indicators as Key Predictors of Oil Volatility: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach

Doojin Ryu, Robert I. Webb, Yeonchan Kang
Computational Economics
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Uncertainty Indicators as Key Predictors of Oil Volatility: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach

Doojin Ryu, Robert I. Webb, Yeonchan Kang
article en

Abstract

We forecast monthly crude oil volatility dynamics using an interpretable machine learning framework applied to a long sample period from 1986 to 2023, encompassing multiple economic cycles, including four NBER-defined recessions, and incorporating 140 macroeconomic and uncertainty variables. Tree-based models (Random Forest and XGBoost) deliver the strongest out-of-sample forecasting performance, though their relative advantage varies across economic regimes. Uncertainty indicators, rather than oil-specific fundamentals, are the most influential predictors, indicating that oil volatility is primarily shaped by broader uncertainty conditions. Time-varying interpretability analyses reveal that the superior performance of tree-based models stems from their ability to flexibly combine multiple signals, an insight not captured by static importance scores. Our results highlight the value of dynamic interpretability in understanding regime-dependent machine learning behavior and offer guidance for volatility modeling.

Computational Economics
University of Virginia (US), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Sungkyunkwan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.