Comparative analysis of the properties of traditional vs 3D printed mortar for building construction

Mortar 3D printing has emerged as a disruptive technology in construction, offering advantages in geometric design, sustainability and production efficiency. The life cycle analysis (LCA) shows a 35% reduction in carbon footprint compared to traditional methods, positioning this technology as a viable alternative for sustainable construction. This study delves into the comparative analysis through non-destructive testing of 3D printed mortars versus traditional methods. The results show that the printing orientation significantly influences the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), with lower values in the X direction due to the presence of interlayer voids. In contrast, the traditional mortar exhibited more homogeneous UPV, reflecting a consolidated microstructure. Ultrasonic attenuation analysis revealed a direct correlation between porosity and wave scattering, confirming that 3D printing technology introduces mechanical anisotropy. These findings underscore the need to optimize extrusion parameters and geometric design to ensure durability in structural applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anales de Edificación
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20868/ade.2025.5638
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of the properties of traditional vs 3D printed mortar for building construction

Tomás Gil López, Alireza Amirfiroozkoohi, Mercedes Valiente-López
Anales de Edificación
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
article

Comparative analysis of the properties of traditional vs 3D printed mortar for building construction

Tomás Gil López, Alireza Amirfiroozkoohi, Mercedes Valiente-López
article en

Abstract

Mortar 3D printing has emerged as a disruptive technology in construction, offering advantages in geometric design, sustainability and production efficiency. The life cycle analysis (LCA) shows a 35% reduction in carbon footprint compared to traditional methods, positioning this technology as a viable alternative for sustainable construction. This study delves into the comparative analysis through non-destructive testing of 3D printed mortars versus traditional methods. The results show that the printing orientation significantly influences the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), with lower values in the X direction due to the presence of interlayer voids. In contrast, the traditional mortar exhibited more homogeneous UPV, reflecting a consolidated microstructure. Ultrasonic attenuation analysis revealed a direct correlation between porosity and wave scattering, confirming that 3D printing technology introduces mechanical anisotropy. These findings underscore the need to optimize extrusion parameters and geometric design to ensure durability in structural applications.

Anales de EdificaciónVol. 11(3)
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of the properties of traditional vs 3D printed mortar for building construction — Tomás Gil López, Alireza Amirfiroozkoohi, et al. · Anales de Edificación (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS