Improving Slope Stability of Lowwall Areas in Coal Mines: A Case Study

Coal mining is an industry susceptible to slope failures, which can lead to significant economic losses and casualties. To mitigate this risk, a study was conducted to assess the stability of a post-landslide slope in the QR pit. The Factor of Safety (FOS) was calculated before and after slope improvement using Slide 6.0 software and the Bishop method. Results indicated that the initial FOS was 1.19, categorizing the slope as NOT STABLE. After improvement, the FOS increased to 1.33, classifying the slope as STABLE. The primary cause of the landslide was identified as groundwater activity, exacerbated by large cavities and cracks in the slope material. To address these issues, three potential mitigation measures were proposed: slope geometry modification, counterweight installation, and geomembrane application. The safety factor analysis necessitated the modification of the slope geometry to improve lowwall slope stability. This was achieved through the application of counterweights and geomembranes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562201009/pdf
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Slope Stability of Lowwall Areas in Coal Mines: A Case Study

Dessy Lestari Saptarini, Rahma Norfaeda, Habib Sahal Khomaini, Kartini
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

Improving Slope Stability of Lowwall Areas in Coal Mines: A Case Study

Dessy Lestari Saptarini, Rahma Norfaeda, Habib Sahal Khomaini, Kartini
article en

Abstract

Coal mining is an industry susceptible to slope failures, which can lead to significant economic losses and casualties. To mitigate this risk, a study was conducted to assess the stability of a post-landslide slope in the QR pit. The Factor of Safety (FOS) was calculated before and after slope improvement using Slide 6.0 software and the Bishop method. Results indicated that the initial FOS was 1.19, categorizing the slope as NOT STABLE. After improvement, the FOS increased to 1.33, classifying the slope as STABLE. The primary cause of the landslide was identified as groundwater activity, exacerbated by large cavities and cracks in the slope material. To address these issues, three potential mitigation measures were proposed: slope geometry modification, counterweight installation, and geomembrane application. The safety factor analysis necessitated the modification of the slope geometry to improve lowwall slope stability. This was achieved through the application of counterweights and geomembranes.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.