Estimating Earthquake-Induced Pore Water Pressure: Hierarchy of Existing Methods

The prediction of earthquake-induced excess pore water pressure is becoming a crucial step for liquefaction-related problems, such as the prediction of settlements, assessment of bearing capacity of shallow foundations, and efficiency of liquefaction mitigation measurements. The goal of this review is to provide a state of the art of the available methods for estimating excess pore water pressure from the most simplified approaches, based on simple hand-made calculations, to the most simplified models for pore pressure prediction, and finally to the most advanced models implemented in computer codes for seismic site response analysis. The hierarchy of the methods is enriched with exemplificative applications from real cases to help understand the classification provided and the usability of each method according to the needs of the professional practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16020061
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Earthquake-Induced Pore Water Pressure: Hierarchy of Existing Methods

Anna Chiaradonna
Geosciences
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Estimating Earthquake-Induced Pore Water Pressure: Hierarchy of Existing Methods

Anna Chiaradonna
article en

Abstract

The prediction of earthquake-induced excess pore water pressure is becoming a crucial step for liquefaction-related problems, such as the prediction of settlements, assessment of bearing capacity of shallow foundations, and efficiency of liquefaction mitigation measurements. The goal of this review is to provide a state of the art of the available methods for estimating excess pore water pressure from the most simplified approaches, based on simple hand-made calculations, to the most simplified models for pore pressure prediction, and finally to the most advanced models implemented in computer codes for seismic site response analysis. The hierarchy of the methods is enriched with exemplificative applications from real cases to help understand the classification provided and the usability of each method according to the needs of the professional practice.

GeosciencesVol. 16(2)
University of L'Aquila (IT)
European Commission, University of California, Davis
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.