Artificial Intelligence Based Tools for Automated Genus-Level Identification of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes

Early and accurate identification and quantification of plant-parasitic nematodes (PPN) is crucial for their effective control. Although valuable, the current techniques for identifying PPN, such as morphology and molecular marker-based methods, can be time and resource-intensive. This study aims to develop and validate cutting-edge computer vision tools for automated, accurate, and reproducible PPN detection. To achieve this goal, we captured microscopic images of the three economically-important PPN genera associated with potato crop: root lesion (RLN; <i>Pratylenchus</i> spp.), root-knot (RKN; <i>Meloidogyne</i> spp.), and stubby root (SRN; <i>Paratrichodorus</i> and <i>Trichodorus</i> spp.), additional plant-parasitic nematodes (PPN-OTHERS) and non-parasitic (NON-PARASITIC) nematodes, for a total of five groups. The captured images (total instances = 8,654) were preprocessed, annotated, and randomly split into three datasets: 75% for training, 15% for validation, and 10% for testing. An object segmentation algorithm, YOLOv11-seg, which predicts each pixel in the image, was trained and evaluated on previously unseen images. The model achieved high accuracy in validation (92.4%) and test: (88.6%) datasets with strong performance for key PPN genera (RKN, RLN, SRN; F1-scores >0.92; AUC >0.93 in the test set). While the NON-PARASITIC showed strong performance (F1-score > 0.846 and AUC >0.91), the PPN-OTHERS group performed poorly (test accuracy: 43.9%), frequently misclassified as RLN and NON-PARASITIC nematodes. The results highlight the potential of artificial intelligence-based tools in identifying PPN, paving the way for the long-term goal of developing automated detection and quantification systems for plant pathogens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Phytopathology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-10-25-0330-r
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Based Tools for Automated Genus-Level Identification of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes

Sam Chavoshi, El Hassan Mayad, Sudha G. C. Upadhaya, Arjun Upadhaya et al.
Phytopathology
Smart Agriculture and AI
article

Artificial Intelligence Based Tools for Automated Genus-Level Identification of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes

Sam Chavoshi, El Hassan Mayad, Sudha G. C. Upadhaya, Arjun Upadhaya, Cynthia Gleason, Inga A. Zasada, David L. Wheeler, Timothy C. Paulitz
article en

Abstract

Early and accurate identification and quantification of plant-parasitic nematodes (PPN) is crucial for their effective control. Although valuable, the current techniques for identifying PPN, such as morphology and molecular marker-based methods, can be time and resource-intensive. This study aims to develop and validate cutting-edge computer vision tools for automated, accurate, and reproducible PPN detection. To achieve this goal, we captured microscopic images of the three economically-important PPN genera associated with potato crop: root lesion (RLN; <i>Pratylenchus</i> spp.), root-knot (RKN; <i>Meloidogyne</i> spp.), and stubby root (SRN; <i>Paratrichodorus</i> and <i>Trichodorus</i> spp.), additional plant-parasitic nematodes (PPN-OTHERS) and non-parasitic (NON-PARASITIC) nematodes, for a total of five groups. The captured images (total instances = 8,654) were preprocessed, annotated, and randomly split into three datasets: 75% for training, 15% for validation, and 10% for testing. An object segmentation algorithm, YOLOv11-seg, which predicts each pixel in the image, was trained and evaluated on previously unseen images. The model achieved high accuracy in validation (92.4%) and test: (88.6%) datasets with strong performance for key PPN genera (RKN, RLN, SRN; F1-scores >0.92; AUC >0.93 in the test set). While the NON-PARASITIC showed strong performance (F1-score > 0.846 and AUC >0.91), the PPN-OTHERS group performed poorly (test accuracy: 43.9%), frequently misclassified as RLN and NON-PARASITIC nematodes. The results highlight the potential of artificial intelligence-based tools in identifying PPN, paving the way for the long-term goal of developing automated detection and quantification systems for plant pathogens.

Phytopathology
Educational Service District 123 (US), Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory (US), Washington State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Smart Agriculture and AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.