Comparative Growth of Red Chrysanthemum Plantlets in Micropropagation and Microponic Systems

<b>Background and Objective:</b> <i>Chrysanthemum</i> is one of the most important ornamental plants worldwide, yet conventional propagation methods remain inefficient; therefore, microponics (a system integrating micropropagation with hydroponics) offers strong potential for producing high-quality planting materials at scale. This study evaluates the efficiency of microponic and micropropagation systems for <i>in vitro</i> propagation of the red cultivar of <i>Chrysanthemum</i>×<i>morifolium</i>, focusing on optimizing medium composition, plant growth regulator levels, medium volume and culture density and comparing plantlet performance during nursery acclimatization. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> <i>In vitro</i> shoots, measuring 1-1.5 cm in length and consisting of two nodes, were used as explants. Experiments were arranged in a completely randomized design with five replicates. Data were statistically analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with IRRISTAT 5.0, SPSS 20.0 and Microsoft Excel to identify the optimal culture conditions for each system and to compare growth parameters of plantlets during nursery conditions with treatment means compared by DMRT at the 5% significance level. <b>Results:</b> The optimal conditions for the microponic system were obtained using liquid 1/2MS medium supplemented with 0.1 ppm naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), with a medium volume of 20 mL and a culture density of nine shoots per vessel. Under these conditions, plantlets exhibited the highest shoot height (2.03 cm), fresh mass (0.17 g), 100% root initiation, 3.89 roots per explant (0.64 cm in length) and 4.26 leaves after two weeks of culture. In contrast, the optimal micropropagation medium was solid MS supplemented with 0.3 ppm NAA, 0.5 g/L activated charcoal (AC), 30 g/L sucrose, with the same culture density that used in the microponic system. Plantlets in this system reached a shoot height of 3.14 cm, a fresh mass of 0.20 g, 100% root initiation, 4.87 roots (3.44 cm in length) and five leaves. After 90 days in the nursery, micropropagated plantlets exhibited greater height, a higher number of leaves and earlier flowering, whereas microponic-derived plantlets developed larger leaves, thicker shoots and wider canopy diameters. <b>Conclusion:</b> The micropropagation system provided optimal conditions for <i>in vitro</i> shoot growth and promoted earlier flowering, while the microponic system improved acclimatization and post-transplant performance of red cultivar of <i>Chrysanthemum</i>×<i>morifolium</i> plantlets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2026.33.47
Primary Topic
Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Growth of Red Chrysanthemum Plantlets in Micropropagation and Microponic Systems

Ngoc-Thang Vu, Thi-Huyen-Trang Pham, Thi-Thu-Ha Phung, Huyen-Trang Le
Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences
Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
article

Comparative Growth of Red Chrysanthemum Plantlets in Micropropagation and Microponic Systems

Ngoc-Thang Vu, Thi-Huyen-Trang Pham, Thi-Thu-Ha Phung, Huyen-Trang Le
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and Objective:</b> <i>Chrysanthemum</i> is one of the most important ornamental plants worldwide, yet conventional propagation methods remain inefficient; therefore, microponics (a system integrating micropropagation with hydroponics) offers strong potential for producing high-quality planting materials at scale. This study evaluates the efficiency of microponic and micropropagation systems for <i>in vitro</i> propagation of the red cultivar of <i>Chrysanthemum</i>×<i>morifolium</i>, focusing on optimizing medium composition, plant growth regulator levels, medium volume and culture density and comparing plantlet performance during nursery acclimatization. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> <i>In vitro</i> shoots, measuring 1-1.5 cm in length and consisting of two nodes, were used as explants. Experiments were arranged in a completely randomized design with five replicates. Data were statistically analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with IRRISTAT 5.0, SPSS 20.0 and Microsoft Excel to identify the optimal culture conditions for each system and to compare growth parameters of plantlets during nursery conditions with treatment means compared by DMRT at the 5% significance level. <b>Results:</b> The optimal conditions for the microponic system were obtained using liquid 1/2MS medium supplemented with 0.1 ppm naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), with a medium volume of 20 mL and a culture density of nine shoots per vessel. Under these conditions, plantlets exhibited the highest shoot height (2.03 cm), fresh mass (0.17 g), 100% root initiation, 3.89 roots per explant (0.64 cm in length) and 4.26 leaves after two weeks of culture. In contrast, the optimal micropropagation medium was solid MS supplemented with 0.3 ppm NAA, 0.5 g/L activated charcoal (AC), 30 g/L sucrose, with the same culture density that used in the microponic system. Plantlets in this system reached a shoot height of 3.14 cm, a fresh mass of 0.20 g, 100% root initiation, 4.87 roots (3.44 cm in length) and five leaves. After 90 days in the nursery, micropropagated plantlets exhibited greater height, a higher number of leaves and earlier flowering, whereas microponic-derived plantlets developed larger leaves, thicker shoots and wider canopy diameters. <b>Conclusion:</b> The micropropagation system provided optimal conditions for <i>in vitro</i> shoot growth and promoted earlier flowering, while the microponic system improved acclimatization and post-transplant performance of red cultivar of <i>Chrysanthemum</i>×<i>morifolium</i> plantlets.

Pakistan Journal of Biological SciencesVol. 29(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.