Development of a New Methodology for Evaluating Arterial Weaving Sections Including All Traffic Movements

Arterial weaving segments present unique operational challenges because of frequent lane changes between origin–destination (OD) pairs. Existing methodologies, such as those in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM7) and NCHRP 15-66, are formulated exclusively for through movements and therefore cannot accurately predict running speeds for vehicles performing weaving or turning maneuvers, which may represent more than half of the total traffic in these facilities. This study develops and validates a new methodology that estimates running speeds by OD and by segment, explicitly capturing the effects of lane utilization, turbulence index, and weaving ratio. Using the NCHRP 15-66 dataset, which includes drone observations from fifteen field sites and more than 1,000 calibrated microsimulation runs, models were estimated using feasible generalized least squares and evaluated through 10-fold cross-validation. The analysis confirmed that vehicles associated with different ODs exhibit statistically distinct running speeds, reinforcing the need for OD-specific modeling. The proposed formulation achieved an average RMSE of 5.27 mph across all OD movements and produced 29.6% lower RMSE than NCHRP 15-66 for through movements under high-demand conditions (> 450 vehicles per hour per lane). These findings demonstrate that OD-specific and regime-based modeling provides a more accurate and transferable representation of arterial weaving operations than existing analytical approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251412439
Primary Topic
Traffic control and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a New Methodology for Evaluating Arterial Weaving Sections Including All Traffic Movements

Gustavo Zschaber, Lily Elefteriadou, Ehsan Amini
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Traffic control and management
article

Development of a New Methodology for Evaluating Arterial Weaving Sections Including All Traffic Movements

Gustavo Zschaber, Lily Elefteriadou, Ehsan Amini
article en

Abstract

Arterial weaving segments present unique operational challenges because of frequent lane changes between origin–destination (OD) pairs. Existing methodologies, such as those in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM7) and NCHRP 15-66, are formulated exclusively for through movements and therefore cannot accurately predict running speeds for vehicles performing weaving or turning maneuvers, which may represent more than half of the total traffic in these facilities. This study develops and validates a new methodology that estimates running speeds by OD and by segment, explicitly capturing the effects of lane utilization, turbulence index, and weaving ratio. Using the NCHRP 15-66 dataset, which includes drone observations from fifteen field sites and more than 1,000 calibrated microsimulation runs, models were estimated using feasible generalized least squares and evaluated through 10-fold cross-validation. The analysis confirmed that vehicles associated with different ODs exhibit statistically distinct running speeds, reinforcing the need for OD-specific modeling. The proposed formulation achieved an average RMSE of 5.27 mph across all OD movements and produced 29.6% lower RMSE than NCHRP 15-66 for through movements under high-demand conditions (> 450 vehicles per hour per lane). These findings demonstrate that OD-specific and regime-based modeling provides a more accurate and transferable representation of arterial weaving operations than existing analytical approaches.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Traffic control and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.