Monumental events: Imaginaries, materialities, and temporalities in Latvia’s monument removal

Through the case of the Victory Monument in Latvia, in this article I explore how symbolic reorderings take place at specific historical moments. This article investigates how monuments can become epitomes of contemporary political and societal ills and explores how processes of their resignification engage both ‘material’ and ‘imaginary’ realms through which politics is animated. The article also reflects on how such monuments can be infused with various temporal values and assemblages – injustices of the past, uncertainties of the present, and fears of a possible future. By tracing how the material intertwines with the imaginary, and how layered temporalities are entangled, the article illustrates how monuments evolve into an oversaturated locus of contestation – misfits – that consequently leads to their obliteration. Such acts of unmaking and erasure represent intense vernacular political commentaries and performances of sovereign agency that actively aim to reconfigure public, social, and physical landscapes of everyday lives against the insurmountable material and imaginary powers of such elements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critique of Anthropology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x261420923
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monumental events: Imaginaries, materialities, and temporalities in Latvia’s monument removal

Elīna Troščenko
Critique of Anthropology
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
article

Monumental events: Imaginaries, materialities, and temporalities in Latvia’s monument removal

Elīna Troščenko
article en

Abstract

Through the case of the Victory Monument in Latvia, in this article I explore how symbolic reorderings take place at specific historical moments. This article investigates how monuments can become epitomes of contemporary political and societal ills and explores how processes of their resignification engage both ‘material’ and ‘imaginary’ realms through which politics is animated. The article also reflects on how such monuments can be infused with various temporal values and assemblages – injustices of the past, uncertainties of the present, and fears of a possible future. By tracing how the material intertwines with the imaginary, and how layered temporalities are entangled, the article illustrates how monuments evolve into an oversaturated locus of contestation – misfits – that consequently leads to their obliteration. Such acts of unmaking and erasure represent intense vernacular political commentaries and performances of sovereign agency that actively aim to reconfigure public, social, and physical landscapes of everyday lives against the insurmountable material and imaginary powers of such elements.

Critique of AnthropologyVol. 46(1)
University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Monumental events: Imaginaries, materialities, and temporalities in Latvia’s monument removal — Elīna Troščenko · Critique of Anthropology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS