Tailoring the Patient Deprescribing Typology to prescribing decisions: diabetes-specific versus standard versions in an online survey

Background Deprescribing is the process of reducing or stopping medicines that may no longer be needed or helpful. Effective deprescribing depends on understanding patients’ beliefs, concerns, and preferences, which influence how they participate in decisions about their medicines. Clear, patient-centered communication is important to make sure decisions about medicines are understood, supported, and safely implemented. The Patient Deprescribing Typology (PDT) offers a novel, preference-based approach that categorizes patients into distinct groups based on their beliefs and preferences regarding medicine use and deprescribing.Aims The PDT was adapted for this exploratory study to compare responses to a diabetes-specific version (administered to participants with diabetes) or a standard version (administered to all other participants).Methods We surveyed adults aged 65 years and older in Australia and the United States (n = 2,199), and compared responses to standard versus diabetes-specific PDT questions.Results Participants answering the diabetes-specific version perceived their medicine as more important, favored physician-led decision-making, and were less open to deprescribing compared to those receiving the general PDT. Preferences for starting or stopping a hypothetical diabetes medicine were associated with distinct attitudes and decision-making styles, suggesting the importance of aligning communication strategies with patients’ typologies.Discussion This study represents a first step toward exploring how condition-specific versions of the PDT may better capture nuanced, medicine-specific patient attitudes and preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Literacy and Communication Open
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/28355245.2026.2618844
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tailoring the Patient Deprescribing Typology to prescribing decisions: diabetes-specific versus standard versions in an online survey

Kristie Rebecca Weir, Sarah E. Vordenberg
Health Literacy and Communication Open
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Tailoring the Patient Deprescribing Typology to prescribing decisions: diabetes-specific versus standard versions in an online survey

Kristie Rebecca Weir, Sarah E. Vordenberg
article en

Abstract

Background Deprescribing is the process of reducing or stopping medicines that may no longer be needed or helpful. Effective deprescribing depends on understanding patients’ beliefs, concerns, and preferences, which influence how they participate in decisions about their medicines. Clear, patient-centered communication is important to make sure decisions about medicines are understood, supported, and safely implemented. The Patient Deprescribing Typology (PDT) offers a novel, preference-based approach that categorizes patients into distinct groups based on their beliefs and preferences regarding medicine use and deprescribing.Aims The PDT was adapted for this exploratory study to compare responses to a diabetes-specific version (administered to participants with diabetes) or a standard version (administered to all other participants).Methods We surveyed adults aged 65 years and older in Australia and the United States (n = 2,199), and compared responses to standard versus diabetes-specific PDT questions.Results Participants answering the diabetes-specific version perceived their medicine as more important, favored physician-led decision-making, and were less open to deprescribing compared to those receiving the general PDT. Preferences for starting or stopping a hypothetical diabetes medicine were associated with distinct attitudes and decision-making styles, suggesting the importance of aligning communication strategies with patients’ typologies.Discussion This study represents a first step toward exploring how condition-specific versions of the PDT may better capture nuanced, medicine-specific patient attitudes and preferences.

Health Literacy and Communication OpenVol. 4(1)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), University of Bern (CH), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Michigan (US), Center for Practical Bioethics (US), Primary HealthCare (MT), Primary Health Care (QA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.