‘There’s Never Just One Type’: A Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation of Adolescent-Focused Low-Intensity Life Story Work

Abstract Life story work is a way of supporting children who spend time in out-of-home care to make sense of their experiences. It is highly valued yet poorly evidenced and inconsistently implemented with adolescents aged 12–18 years old. We sought to improve our understandings of the ways in which carers are already supporting what we describe as adolescent-focused low-intensity life story work (AF-LI-LSW) to improve the quality, consistency and availability of this support. We collected data from seventy-eight participants (adolescents, carers and social care professionals) from eight English Local Authorities. Using a participatory realist evaluation, we analysed qualitative and quantitative data to develop and test our understandings of AF-LI-LSW. We developed seven principles indicating that AF-LI-LSW is likely to be optimal when: it is flexible and person-centred; starts early; begins in the present; provides future storytelling prompts; adolescents are encouraged to participate; focusses on everyday life and when training and support is available. Participants’ experiences were characterized by several dilemmas. The need to offer (and desire for care-experienced adolescents to enact) participation choices whilst acting in the best interest of adolescents in current and possible future contexts. Our findings provide guidance for carers, adolescents and children’s out-of-home care more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Social Work
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaf313
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘There’s Never Just One Type’: A Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation of Adolescent-Focused Low-Intensity Life Story Work

Erika Sims, Jonathon Wilson, Ella Mickleburgh, Rosie Blackett et al.
The British Journal of Social Work
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

‘There’s Never Just One Type’: A Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation of Adolescent-Focused Low-Intensity Life Story Work

Erika Sims, Jonathon Wilson, Ella Mickleburgh, Rosie Blackett, Simon Patrick Hammond, Sarah Thomas, Elsbeth Neil, Wendy Hardeman, Lee Shepstone, Paige Skevington, Geoff Wong, Jeanette Cossar, Emma Speer, Kayley Baker, Rachel Hiller, Peter Jordan, Nick Midgley, Carys Seeley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Life story work is a way of supporting children who spend time in out-of-home care to make sense of their experiences. It is highly valued yet poorly evidenced and inconsistently implemented with adolescents aged 12–18 years old. We sought to improve our understandings of the ways in which carers are already supporting what we describe as adolescent-focused low-intensity life story work (AF-LI-LSW) to improve the quality, consistency and availability of this support. We collected data from seventy-eight participants (adolescents, carers and social care professionals) from eight English Local Authorities. Using a participatory realist evaluation, we analysed qualitative and quantitative data to develop and test our understandings of AF-LI-LSW. We developed seven principles indicating that AF-LI-LSW is likely to be optimal when: it is flexible and person-centred; starts early; begins in the present; provides future storytelling prompts; adolescents are encouraged to participate; focusses on everyday life and when training and support is available. Participants’ experiences were characterized by several dilemmas. The need to offer (and desire for care-experienced adolescents to enact) participation choices whilst acting in the best interest of adolescents in current and possible future contexts. Our findings provide guidance for carers, adolescents and children’s out-of-home care more broadly.

The British Journal of Social Work
University of East Anglia (GB), Norwich University (US), Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Anna Freud Centre (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Stoke-on-Trent City Council (GB), University College London (GB), Network Rail (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.