Unpacking early risks for peer victimization: A network analysis of early temperament and polygenic risk scores

Abstract Background Children who show difficult temperament are at risk of peer victimisation, which in turn associates with numerous negative outcomes later in life. We used network analysis to examine whether specific aspects of difficult temperament contributed to these associations, and whether the links were moderated by variations in genetic liability for ADHD, schizophrenia, and depression. Methods In 3354 mother‐child dyads (51.8% female), we examined in three steps: (i) the network structure of difficult temperament as indexed by adaptability , intensity , and mood (age 2), (ii) its item‐level associations with peer victimisation (ages 8, 10, and 13), and (iii) moderation of these associations by polygenic risk scores (PRS) for ADHD, schizophrenia, and depression. Results Indicators of difficult temperament formed a coherent network that was associated with peer victimisation. Regarding PRS moderation, for those high in PRS (top 10%) for ADHD and schizophrenia, indicators of temperamental intensity and mood were associated with peer victimisation, respectively. For those high in PRS for depression, however, aspects of temperament were no longer associated with peer victimisation. Finally, the network results for those in the general population across all PRS (bottom 90%) largely resembled the model estimated using the full sample. Conclusion The findings highlight specific temperamental behaviours as risk factors for peer victimisation; additionally, children high in PRS for neurodevelopmental disorders may be at especially high‐risk for this outcome early in development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCPP Advances
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70092
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking early risks for peer victimization: A network analysis of early temperament and polygenic risk scores

Tom C.‐H. Wu, Liliana Garcia‐Mondragon, Alex F. Martin, Deniz Konac et al.
JCPP Advances
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Unpacking early risks for peer victimization: A network analysis of early temperament and polygenic risk scores

Tom C.‐H. Wu, Liliana Garcia‐Mondragon, Alex F. Martin, Deniz Konac, Barbara Maughan, Ted Barker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Children who show difficult temperament are at risk of peer victimisation, which in turn associates with numerous negative outcomes later in life. We used network analysis to examine whether specific aspects of difficult temperament contributed to these associations, and whether the links were moderated by variations in genetic liability for ADHD, schizophrenia, and depression. Methods In 3354 mother‐child dyads (51.8% female), we examined in three steps: (i) the network structure of difficult temperament as indexed by adaptability , intensity , and mood (age 2), (ii) its item‐level associations with peer victimisation (ages 8, 10, and 13), and (iii) moderation of these associations by polygenic risk scores (PRS) for ADHD, schizophrenia, and depression. Results Indicators of difficult temperament formed a coherent network that was associated with peer victimisation. Regarding PRS moderation, for those high in PRS (top 10%) for ADHD and schizophrenia, indicators of temperamental intensity and mood were associated with peer victimisation, respectively. For those high in PRS for depression, however, aspects of temperament were no longer associated with peer victimisation. Finally, the network results for those in the general population across all PRS (bottom 90%) largely resembled the model estimated using the full sample. Conclusion The findings highlight specific temperamental behaviours as risk factors for peer victimisation; additionally, children high in PRS for neurodevelopmental disorders may be at especially high‐risk for this outcome early in development.

JCPP Advances
King's College London (GB), Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE), University College London (GB), Adana Science and Technology University (TR)
King's College London, University of Bristol, National Institutes of Health, Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.