An objective Bayesian method for including parameter uncertainty in ensemble model output statistics

Abstract Ensemble forecasts are often calibrated using regression methods known as ensemble model output statistics (EMOS). Most of the EMOS methods described in the literature make the assumption that statistical parameter uncertainty is negligible, although making this assumption has been shown to be detrimental to forecast quality. We use simulations to show that this assumption would be expected to give unreliable forecasts and underprediction of extremes. Previous research has described how parameter uncertainty can be included in EMOS models using bootstrapping. We show that bootstrapping can be replaced with an analytical approach based on right Haar prior (RHP) theory, a branch of objective Bayesian statistics. For two commonly used EMOS models, simple linear regression (SLR) and heteroscedastic linear regression (HLR, also known as non‐homogeneous Gaussian regression), we show that RHP theory leads to perfectly reliable predictions, if the distributional assumptions are met. We apply SLR and HLR methods, with and without parameter uncertainty, to 5 years of past medium‐range forecasts for eight Northern Hemisphere locations and evaluate forecast accuracy and reliability. We find that the RHP version of HLR is the most accurate in terms of both log‐score and continuous ranked probability score. It is also the most reliable, and it reduces the underestimation of extremes seen in the other methods. Our results with regard to the benefits of including parameter uncertainty agree with the previous results based on bootstrapping, although the RHP calculations are faster and more accurate. A free software library is available for applying the various methods, and execution is computationally inexpensive. We conclude that the RHP version of HLR should be used in preference to the other methods tested. Further research would be needed to understand how to use objective Bayesian methods to include parameter uncertainty in other EMOS models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.70108
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An objective Bayesian method for including parameter uncertainty in ensemble model output statistics

Paul J. Northrop, Gabriele Messori, Trevor Sweeting, Leonardo Olivetti et al.
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Climate variability and models
article

An objective Bayesian method for including parameter uncertainty in ensemble model output statistics

Paul J. Northrop, Gabriele Messori, Trevor Sweeting, Leonardo Olivetti, Stephen Jewson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ensemble forecasts are often calibrated using regression methods known as ensemble model output statistics (EMOS). Most of the EMOS methods described in the literature make the assumption that statistical parameter uncertainty is negligible, although making this assumption has been shown to be detrimental to forecast quality. We use simulations to show that this assumption would be expected to give unreliable forecasts and underprediction of extremes. Previous research has described how parameter uncertainty can be included in EMOS models using bootstrapping. We show that bootstrapping can be replaced with an analytical approach based on right Haar prior (RHP) theory, a branch of objective Bayesian statistics. For two commonly used EMOS models, simple linear regression (SLR) and heteroscedastic linear regression (HLR, also known as non‐homogeneous Gaussian regression), we show that RHP theory leads to perfectly reliable predictions, if the distributional assumptions are met. We apply SLR and HLR methods, with and without parameter uncertainty, to 5 years of past medium‐range forecasts for eight Northern Hemisphere locations and evaluate forecast accuracy and reliability. We find that the RHP version of HLR is the most accurate in terms of both log‐score and continuous ranked probability score. It is also the most reliable, and it reduces the underestimation of extremes seen in the other methods. Our results with regard to the benefits of including parameter uncertainty agree with the previous results based on bootstrapping, although the RHP calculations are faster and more accurate. A free software library is available for applying the various methods, and execution is computationally inexpensive. We conclude that the RHP version of HLR should be used in preference to the other methods tested. Further research would be needed to understand how to use objective Bayesian methods to include parameter uncertainty in other EMOS models.

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Uppsala University (SE), Stockholm University (SE), Swedish Species Information Centre (SE), Lambda Therapeutic Research (India) (IN), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.