Molecular Insights into Aggregation Kinetics of Methane Hydrate Particles and Anti-agglomerant Mechanism

Understanding the microscopic mechanisms governing methane hydrate aggregation and the inhibition effects of antiagglomerants (AAs) is essential for flow assurance in deep-water–oil and gas pipelines. Using large-scale molecular dynamics simulations, this study investigates the aggregation kinetics of methane hydrate particles in the presence of different types and interfacial densities of AAs. Three representative AAs─cocamidopropyl dimethylamine (CDA), cocamidopropyl betaine (CAB), and cocamidopropyl trimethylammonium chloride (CATC)─were simulated at 277 K and 10 MPa. The results indicate that all three AAs inhibit hydrate particle aggregation by adsorbing onto the hydrate surface, modifying surface wettability, and enhancing dispersion in the hydrocarbon phase. Among them, CDA exhibits the optimal inhibition performance of particle mobility and provides the highest surface coverage, whereas CAB and CATC show relatively weaker inhibitory performance. The antiagglomeration mechanism depends on the interparticle separation: steric hindrance from hydrophobic tails dominates at short distances, while interfacial coverage and adsorption strength govern dispersion at larger separations. Increased surface coverage improves dispersion stability in the hydrocarbon phase. At lower interfacial densities, reduced coverage weakens CDA’s ability to lower interfacial tension, thereby diminishing its inhibition of hydrate motion. Overall, the surface coverage follows the order CDA > CAB ≈ CATC. These findings clarify the molecular-level mechanisms of AA-mediated inhibition and provide a theoretical basis for the design of effective hydrate AAs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c06256
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Molecular Insights into Aggregation Kinetics of Methane Hydrate Particles and Anti-agglomerant Mechanism

Shuangyi Zhao, Dongliang Zhong, Liangmeng Wu, Hanqi Xu et al.
Energy & Fuels
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
article

Molecular Insights into Aggregation Kinetics of Methane Hydrate Particles and Anti-agglomerant Mechanism

Shuangyi Zhao, Dongliang Zhong, Liangmeng Wu, Hanqi Xu, Tianyang Li, Caiyun Xiao
article en

Abstract

Understanding the microscopic mechanisms governing methane hydrate aggregation and the inhibition effects of antiagglomerants (AAs) is essential for flow assurance in deep-water–oil and gas pipelines. Using large-scale molecular dynamics simulations, this study investigates the aggregation kinetics of methane hydrate particles in the presence of different types and interfacial densities of AAs. Three representative AAs─cocamidopropyl dimethylamine (CDA), cocamidopropyl betaine (CAB), and cocamidopropyl trimethylammonium chloride (CATC)─were simulated at 277 K and 10 MPa. The results indicate that all three AAs inhibit hydrate particle aggregation by adsorbing onto the hydrate surface, modifying surface wettability, and enhancing dispersion in the hydrocarbon phase. Among them, CDA exhibits the optimal inhibition performance of particle mobility and provides the highest surface coverage, whereas CAB and CATC show relatively weaker inhibitory performance. The antiagglomeration mechanism depends on the interparticle separation: steric hindrance from hydrophobic tails dominates at short distances, while interfacial coverage and adsorption strength govern dispersion at larger separations. Increased surface coverage improves dispersion stability in the hydrocarbon phase. At lower interfacial densities, reduced coverage weakens CDA’s ability to lower interfacial tension, thereby diminishing its inhibition of hydrate motion. Overall, the surface coverage follows the order CDA > CAB ≈ CATC. These findings clarify the molecular-level mechanisms of AA-mediated inhibition and provide a theoretical basis for the design of effective hydrate AAs.

Energy & FuelsVol. 40(6)
Chongqing University (CN), RS Dynamics (Czechia) (CZ), State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.