Theorising sociotechnical complexity: a grounded theory framework for qualitative information systems research

Purpose This study introduces a grounded theory framework designed to meet the growing demand for qualitative methodologies that are both methodologically rigorous and adaptable to the complexities of sociotechnical phenomena. Design/methodology/approach Building on foundational and contemporary grounded theory literature, the paper proposes a five-stage framework that integrates iterative data collection, theoretical sampling, constant comparative analysis, and multidimensional coding. The framework is demonstrated through an empirical study that examines how cultural factors influence the alignment of business and information systems (IS) strategies in multinational enterprises. Findings The framework enables researchers to conduct iterative and reflexive inquiry while preserving analytic coherence. It supports the emergence of context-sensitive categories and processual insights, particularly valuable when investigating the fluid interplay of technology, organisational practices, and cultural dynamics. The empirical application highlights its utility in uncovering latent patterns in complex digital environments. Research limitations/implications This study makes three distinct contributions. First, it offers a structured yet flexible grounded theory framework. Second, it demonstrates how grounded theorising enhances theoretical depth and relevance when engaging with culturally situated, evolving phenomena. Third, it provides practical methodological guidance for maintaining rigour in qualitative studies addressing emergent and sociotechnical complexities. Together, these contributions support more robust theorisation in qualitative IS research. Practical implications The framework offers guidance for IS researchers and practitioners engaged in digital transformation, cross-cultural systems implementation, and technology adoption. It facilitates the generation of empirically grounded insights that extend beyond the explanatory reach of conventional deductive models, especially in multicultural or fluid organisational settings. Originality/value By bridging methodological theory and research practice, this study advances the application of grounded theory within the IS field. It provides an adaptable, reflexive framework capable of uncovering how technology, organisational structures, and cultural processes interact and evolve. The approach equips researchers with a robust alternative to linear models in exploring digital innovation and transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research Journal
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-06-2025-0209
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theorising sociotechnical complexity: a grounded theory framework for qualitative information systems research

Godfried B. Adaba
Qualitative Research Journal
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Theorising sociotechnical complexity: a grounded theory framework for qualitative information systems research

Godfried B. Adaba
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study introduces a grounded theory framework designed to meet the growing demand for qualitative methodologies that are both methodologically rigorous and adaptable to the complexities of sociotechnical phenomena. Design/methodology/approach Building on foundational and contemporary grounded theory literature, the paper proposes a five-stage framework that integrates iterative data collection, theoretical sampling, constant comparative analysis, and multidimensional coding. The framework is demonstrated through an empirical study that examines how cultural factors influence the alignment of business and information systems (IS) strategies in multinational enterprises. Findings The framework enables researchers to conduct iterative and reflexive inquiry while preserving analytic coherence. It supports the emergence of context-sensitive categories and processual insights, particularly valuable when investigating the fluid interplay of technology, organisational practices, and cultural dynamics. The empirical application highlights its utility in uncovering latent patterns in complex digital environments. Research limitations/implications This study makes three distinct contributions. First, it offers a structured yet flexible grounded theory framework. Second, it demonstrates how grounded theorising enhances theoretical depth and relevance when engaging with culturally situated, evolving phenomena. Third, it provides practical methodological guidance for maintaining rigour in qualitative studies addressing emergent and sociotechnical complexities. Together, these contributions support more robust theorisation in qualitative IS research. Practical implications The framework offers guidance for IS researchers and practitioners engaged in digital transformation, cross-cultural systems implementation, and technology adoption. It facilitates the generation of empirically grounded insights that extend beyond the explanatory reach of conventional deductive models, especially in multicultural or fluid organisational settings. Originality/value By bridging methodological theory and research practice, this study advances the application of grounded theory within the IS field. It provides an adaptable, reflexive framework capable of uncovering how technology, organisational structures, and cultural processes interact and evolve. The approach equips researchers with a robust alternative to linear models in exploring digital innovation and transformation.

Qualitative Research Journal
University of East London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.