Deep Learning Atmospheric Models Reliably Simulate Out‐of‐Sample Land Heat and Cold Wave Frequencies

Abstract Deep learning (DL)–based general circulation models (GCMs) are emerging as fast simulators, yet their ability to replicate extreme events outside their training range remains unknown. Here, we evaluate two such models—the hybrid Neural General Circulation Model (NGCM) and purely data‐driven Deep Learning Earth System Model (DLESyM)—against a conventional high‐resolution land–atmosphere model (HiRAM) in simulating land heatwaves and coldwaves. All models are forced with observed sea surface temperatures and sea ice over 1900–2020, focusing on the out‐of‐sample period (1900–1960). Both DL models generalize successfully to unseen climate conditions, broadly reproducing the frequency and spatial patterns of heatwave and coldwave events during 1900–1960 with skill comparable to HiRAM. An exception is over portions of North Asia and North America, where all models perform poorly during 1940–1960. Due to excessive temperature autocorrelation, DLESyM tends to overestimate heatwave and coldwave frequencies, whereas the physics–DL hybrid NGCM exhibits persistence more similar to HiRAM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl117990
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning Atmospheric Models Reliably Simulate Out‐of‐Sample Land Heat and Cold Wave Frequencies

Gregory J. Hakim, Wenchang Yang, Gabriel A. Vecchi, Zilu Meng
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
article

Deep Learning Atmospheric Models Reliably Simulate Out‐of‐Sample Land Heat and Cold Wave Frequencies

Gregory J. Hakim, Wenchang Yang, Gabriel A. Vecchi, Zilu Meng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Deep learning (DL)–based general circulation models (GCMs) are emerging as fast simulators, yet their ability to replicate extreme events outside their training range remains unknown. Here, we evaluate two such models—the hybrid Neural General Circulation Model (NGCM) and purely data‐driven Deep Learning Earth System Model (DLESyM)—against a conventional high‐resolution land–atmosphere model (HiRAM) in simulating land heatwaves and coldwaves. All models are forced with observed sea surface temperatures and sea ice over 1900–2020, focusing on the out‐of‐sample period (1900–1960). Both DL models generalize successfully to unseen climate conditions, broadly reproducing the frequency and spatial patterns of heatwave and coldwave events during 1900–1960 with skill comparable to HiRAM. An exception is over portions of North Asia and North America, where all models perform poorly during 1940–1960. Due to excessive temperature autocorrelation, DLESyM tends to overestimate heatwave and coldwave frequencies, whereas the physics–DL hybrid NGCM exhibits persistence more similar to HiRAM.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(3)
Princeton University (US), University of Washington (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Washington
Life below water, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deep Learning Atmospheric Models Reliably Simulate Out‐of‐Sample Land Heat and Cold Wave Frequencies — Gregory J. Hakim, Wenchang Yang, et al. · Geophysical Research Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS