Case Study: Using AI to Design More Effective, Efficient, and Equity Focused Grant Application Review Processes

Grants fuel millions of organizations and advance social innovation across sectors. In the United States, foundations and corporations respectively awarded $103.5B and $36.5B to nonprofits in 2023 alone (Childress, 2024; Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, 2024). By extension, grant applications play a critical role in how grant recipients are identified and selected. While many funders are eager for more streamlined and equitable processes to review grant applications, the process remains primarily a manual and time consuming one (Hewlett Foundation, 2021). These factors leave some funders implementing grant application processes potentially at odds with their impact goals. Examples include restricting who can apply, including only application reviewers with specific credentials, or not screening for inconsistencies among reviewer assessments (Candid., n.d.). In this article, readers will learn how Missouri Foundation for Health and AI PRIORI® used artificial intelligence to inform a more effective, efficient, and equity focused application review process. Readers will gain insights into the experiments, AI tools used, and preparation and evaluation of data sets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Foundation Review
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1767
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case Study: Using AI to Design More Effective, Efficient, and Equity Focused Grant Application Review Processes

Bryan Speelman, Emily Yu
The Foundation Review
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Case Study: Using AI to Design More Effective, Efficient, and Equity Focused Grant Application Review Processes

Bryan Speelman, Emily Yu
article en

Abstract

Grants fuel millions of organizations and advance social innovation across sectors. In the United States, foundations and corporations respectively awarded $103.5B and $36.5B to nonprofits in 2023 alone (Childress, 2024; Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, 2024). By extension, grant applications play a critical role in how grant recipients are identified and selected. While many funders are eager for more streamlined and equitable processes to review grant applications, the process remains primarily a manual and time consuming one (Hewlett Foundation, 2021). These factors leave some funders implementing grant application processes potentially at odds with their impact goals. Examples include restricting who can apply, including only application reviewers with specific credentials, or not screening for inconsistencies among reviewer assessments (Candid., n.d.). In this article, readers will learn how Missouri Foundation for Health and AI PRIORI® used artificial intelligence to inform a more effective, efficient, and equity focused application review process. Readers will gain insights into the experiments, AI tools used, and preparation and evaluation of data sets.

The Foundation ReviewVol. 17(3)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.