Does Exposure to Campus Diversity Posters Influence Pro‐Diversity Attitudes? Exploring the Differential Motivational Processes of Peer and Institutional Norms

ABSTRACT Exposure to diversity initiatives can foster positive attitudes among dominant group members in some cases but spark unintended backlash in others. We aim to clarify these mixed effects from the perspective of normative influences on individuals' motivation. We hypothesised that students' perceptions of peer and university norms have distinct motivational pathways that drive pro‐diversity attitudes and behaviours. In this experiment, White students at a Canadian university ( N = 270; M age = 21.68) were exposed to either posters featuring campus‐wide diversity initiatives or non‐diversity‐related posters. We found that exposure to diversity posters (vs. control) heightened students' perceptions of both peer and institutional diversity norms, but with contrasting mediating effects. Specifically, students who perceived strong peer norms were more internally motivated to avoid prejudice and showed greater support for various diversity initiatives, policies and ideologies. In contrast, students who perceived strong institutional norms were more motivated by external rather than internal reasons, leading to a decreased appreciation for diversity. These findings underscore the motivational impacts of different social norms in diversity initiatives. Understanding individuals' motivations and their normative influences can provide better insights into fostering more internalised diversity attitudes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70227
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Exposure to Campus Diversity Posters Influence Pro‐Diversity Attitudes? Exploring the Differential Motivational Processes of Peer and Institutional Norms

Kemmerly Chipongian, Nigel Mantou Lou
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Does Exposure to Campus Diversity Posters Influence Pro‐Diversity Attitudes? Exploring the Differential Motivational Processes of Peer and Institutional Norms

Kemmerly Chipongian, Nigel Mantou Lou
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Exposure to diversity initiatives can foster positive attitudes among dominant group members in some cases but spark unintended backlash in others. We aim to clarify these mixed effects from the perspective of normative influences on individuals' motivation. We hypothesised that students' perceptions of peer and university norms have distinct motivational pathways that drive pro‐diversity attitudes and behaviours. In this experiment, White students at a Canadian university ( N = 270; M age = 21.68) were exposed to either posters featuring campus‐wide diversity initiatives or non‐diversity‐related posters. We found that exposure to diversity posters (vs. control) heightened students' perceptions of both peer and institutional diversity norms, but with contrasting mediating effects. Specifically, students who perceived strong peer norms were more internally motivated to avoid prejudice and showed greater support for various diversity initiatives, policies and ideologies. In contrast, students who perceived strong institutional norms were more motivated by external rather than internal reasons, leading to a decreased appreciation for diversity. These findings underscore the motivational impacts of different social norms in diversity initiatives. Understanding individuals' motivations and their normative influences can provide better insights into fostering more internalised diversity attitudes.

Journal of Community & Applied Social PsychologyVol. 36(2)
University of Victoria (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.