Nightmares (un‐)limited: segmentary egalitarianism in northeast highland Georgia

This article demonstrates that while egalitarianism has long remained a social goal for many, the social costs are often high. The case material stems from highland northeast Georgia before the region's integration into the Russian Empire in the nineteenth century. Based on an analysis of the interplay between religion and everyday politics, it shows how egalitarian relationships among men were directly contingent on affirmations of hierarchy, evidenced in the exclusion of superiors and inferiors. The superiors were metahuman beings who ruled like feudal lords in a region that had protected itself against ‘real’ feudal domination for centuries. However, the power of these metahumans was spatially and temporally restricted. The excluded inferiors were women who were declared dangerous to men and metahumans alike due to menstruation. Such ‘segmentary egalitarianism’ entails both an emancipatory and an oppressive component. The emancipatory element takes off from the revolt against victimhood and is inherent to the restriction of metahuman governance. The oppressive moment replicates hierarchy in egalitarianism by excluding and suppressing people who are perceived as similar, but sufficiently different.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.70068
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nightmares (un‐)limited: segmentary egalitarianism in northeast highland Georgia

Florian Mühlfried
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Soviet and Russian History
article

Nightmares (un‐)limited: segmentary egalitarianism in northeast highland Georgia

Florian Mühlfried
article en

Abstract

This article demonstrates that while egalitarianism has long remained a social goal for many, the social costs are often high. The case material stems from highland northeast Georgia before the region's integration into the Russian Empire in the nineteenth century. Based on an analysis of the interplay between religion and everyday politics, it shows how egalitarian relationships among men were directly contingent on affirmations of hierarchy, evidenced in the exclusion of superiors and inferiors. The superiors were metahuman beings who ruled like feudal lords in a region that had protected itself against ‘real’ feudal domination for centuries. However, the power of these metahumans was spatially and temporally restricted. The excluded inferiors were women who were declared dangerous to men and metahumans alike due to menstruation. Such ‘segmentary egalitarianism’ entails both an emancipatory and an oppressive component. The emancipatory element takes off from the revolt against victimhood and is inherent to the restriction of metahuman governance. The oppressive moment replicates hierarchy in egalitarianism by excluding and suppressing people who are perceived as similar, but sufficiently different.

Journal of the Royal Anthropological InstituteVol. 32(S1)
Ilia State University (GE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nightmares (un‐)limited: segmentary egalitarianism in northeast highland Georgia — Florian Mühlfried · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS