Improving EEG forward modeling using high-resolution five-layer BEM-FMM head models: Effect on source reconstruction accuracy

Electroencephalographic (EEG) source localization is a fundamental tool for clinical diagnoses and brain-computer interfaces. We investigate the impact of model complexity on reconstruction accuracy by comparing the widely used three-layer boundary element method (BEM) as an inverse method against a five-layer BEM accelerated by the fast multipole method (BEM-FMM) and coupled with adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) as forward solver. Modern BEM-FMM with AMR can solve high-resolution multi-tissue models efficiently and accurately. We generated noiseless 256-channel EEG data from 15 subjects in the Connectome Young Adult dataset, using four anatomically relevant dipole positions, three conductivity sets, and two head segmentations; we mapped localization errors across the entire grey matter from 4000 dipole positions. The average location error among our four selected dipoles is ∼5mm (±2mm) with an orientation error of ∼12∘ (±7∘). The average source localization error across the entire grey matter is ∼9mm (±4mm), with a tendency for smaller errors on the occipital lobe. Our findings indicate that while three-layer models are robust under noiseless conditions, substantial localization errors (10-20mm) are common. Therefore, models of five or more layers may be needed for accurate source reconstruction in critical applications involving noisy EEG data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
Published
2024-10-26
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving EEG forward modeling using high-resolution five-layer BEM-FMM head models: Effect on source reconstruction accuracy

R. McSweeney, S. Makaroff, T. Raij, G. Nuñez Ponasso et al.
MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Improving EEG forward modeling using high-resolution five-layer BEM-FMM head models: Effect on source reconstruction accuracy

R. McSweeney, S. Makaroff, T. Raij, G. Nuñez Ponasso, G. Noetscher, K. ; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-2042 Weise, P. Lai, J. Haueisen, B. ; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7857-291X Maess, W. Wartman, T. ; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9668-3261 Knösche
article en

Abstract

Electroencephalographic (EEG) source localization is a fundamental tool for clinical diagnoses and brain-computer interfaces. We investigate the impact of model complexity on reconstruction accuracy by comparing the widely used three-layer boundary element method (BEM) as an inverse method against a five-layer BEM accelerated by the fast multipole method (BEM-FMM) and coupled with adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) as forward solver. Modern BEM-FMM with AMR can solve high-resolution multi-tissue models efficiently and accurately. We generated noiseless 256-channel EEG data from 15 subjects in the Connectome Young Adult dataset, using four anatomically relevant dipole positions, three conductivity sets, and two head segmentations; we mapped localization errors across the entire grey matter from 4000 dipole positions. The average location error among our four selected dipoles is ∼5mm (±2mm) with an orientation error of ∼12∘ (±7∘). The average source localization error across the entire grey matter is ∼9mm (±4mm), with a tendency for smaller errors on the occipital lobe. Our findings indicate that while three-layer models are robust under noiseless conditions, substantial localization errors (10-20mm) are common. Therefore, models of five or more layers may be needed for accurate source reconstruction in critical applications involving noisy EEG data.

MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.