Understanding The Quality Of Administrative Action: Who And What Counts?

To understand the quality of administrative action, it is crucial to incorporate the per-spectives of those affected. This paper introduces and demonstrates a method for identi-fying stakeholders based on their urgency, legitimacy, and power, and examines stake-holders' interests using theories from motivational psychology. In the context of constitu-tive administrative acts, stakeholders were identified as applicants, third parties, public managers, elected officials, and the legislature. A combination of userexperience sam-pling, interviews, and legal source reviews was used to determine stakeholders’ urgen-cies, motives, and values, highlighting common priorities and potential conflicts. This approach advances the conceptualization and measurement of good administration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Hochschule für öffentliche Verwaltung und Finanzen Ludwigsburg Bibliothek (University of Applied Sciences)
Published
2025-12-19
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding The Quality Of Administrative Action: Who And What Counts?

Michael Schorn, Julia Kaesmayr, Anna (Prof. Dr.) Steidle
Hochschule für öffentliche Verwaltung und Finanzen Ludwigsburg Bibliothek (University of Applied Sciences)
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Understanding The Quality Of Administrative Action: Who And What Counts?

Michael Schorn, Julia Kaesmayr, Anna (Prof. Dr.) Steidle
article en

Abstract

To understand the quality of administrative action, it is crucial to incorporate the per-spectives of those affected. This paper introduces and demonstrates a method for identi-fying stakeholders based on their urgency, legitimacy, and power, and examines stake-holders' interests using theories from motivational psychology. In the context of constitu-tive administrative acts, stakeholders were identified as applicants, third parties, public managers, elected officials, and the legislature. A combination of userexperience sam-pling, interviews, and legal source reviews was used to determine stakeholders’ urgen-cies, motives, and values, highlighting common priorities and potential conflicts. This approach advances the conceptualization and measurement of good administration.

Hochschule für öffentliche Verwaltung und Finanzen Ludwigsburg Bibliothek (University of Applied Sciences)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.