Governance and Reform of Paratransit – An institutional strategy to strengthen the role and function of the regulator

Reforming and regulating informal paratransit systems present significant challenges, often focused on managing poor service quality, safety concerns, replacing outdated vehicles, and competition issues, leading to efforts at formalising or removing them. There is an evolving discourse on paratransit reform exploring diverse approaches, recognising the sector's entrepreneurial potential and its key role in urban transportation. This highlights the need for inclusive regulatory frameworks considering paratransit's unique characteristics. Contemporary interventions, such as BRT implementation, data and technology integration, and institutional reforms, show some success yet significant limitations. Many of the interventions do not resolve the business model, or the institutional structure. The exception is formalizing paratransit through BRT projects; however, implementation confronts difficult on-ground realities. Effective management structures and sustainable business models are crucial. Analysis reveals that regulation alone is ineffective due to the entrepreneurial nature of paratransit and cities' limited regulatory capacity. Regulation is often ineffective against economic forces and operator survival instincts. Cities attempting to solve this regulatory dilemma, engaging more formally, through gross cost contracting, often face an unmanageable risk burden, demonstrating that regulators should regulate risk-takers rather than manage risks themselves. This paper proposes a partnership contract model with paratransit, that involves sharing risk with a commercial, business-like public sector partner. This will enhance public sector capacity with a shift from a regulatory to a managerial approach. The proposal for an appropriate contract paratransit ensures a sustainable business model for operators where they carry demand risk, incentivising them to plan and adapt services, grow demand, and be rewarded for their efforts. It also provides a pathway to meaningful integration of paratransit into the public transport network.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney)
Published
2024-12-06
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance and Reform of Paratransit – An institutional strategy to strengthen the role and function of the regulator

Frits Olyslagers
The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney)
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Governance and Reform of Paratransit – An institutional strategy to strengthen the role and function of the regulator

Frits Olyslagers
article en

Abstract

Reforming and regulating informal paratransit systems present significant challenges, often focused on managing poor service quality, safety concerns, replacing outdated vehicles, and competition issues, leading to efforts at formalising or removing them. There is an evolving discourse on paratransit reform exploring diverse approaches, recognising the sector's entrepreneurial potential and its key role in urban transportation. This highlights the need for inclusive regulatory frameworks considering paratransit's unique characteristics. Contemporary interventions, such as BRT implementation, data and technology integration, and institutional reforms, show some success yet significant limitations. Many of the interventions do not resolve the business model, or the institutional structure. The exception is formalizing paratransit through BRT projects; however, implementation confronts difficult on-ground realities. Effective management structures and sustainable business models are crucial. Analysis reveals that regulation alone is ineffective due to the entrepreneurial nature of paratransit and cities' limited regulatory capacity. Regulation is often ineffective against economic forces and operator survival instincts. Cities attempting to solve this regulatory dilemma, engaging more formally, through gross cost contracting, often face an unmanageable risk burden, demonstrating that regulators should regulate risk-takers rather than manage risks themselves. This paper proposes a partnership contract model with paratransit, that involves sharing risk with a commercial, business-like public sector partner. This will enhance public sector capacity with a shift from a regulatory to a managerial approach. The proposal for an appropriate contract paratransit ensures a sustainable business model for operators where they carry demand risk, incentivising them to plan and adapt services, grow demand, and be rewarded for their efforts. It also provides a pathway to meaningful integration of paratransit into the public transport network.

The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Governance and Reform of Paratransit – An institutional strategy to strengthen the role and function of the regulator — Frits Olyslagers · The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS