Acquirer Strategic Orientations, Integration Decisions, and Performance
Integration decisions are not isolated, as they are embedded in an organizational context. Using a multi-country sample (Nordics, German speaking Europe, and China) of small- and medium-sized acquirers, we explore the influence of firm strategic orientations on how managers conceptualize acquisitions, make integration decisions, and impact acquisition performance. Both market- and entrepreneurial-oriented firms coordinate activities following an acquisition, but they do so differently. Entrepreneurial-oriented acquirers use human integration to align target managers with common goals and reinforce their decision-making autonomy. In contrast, market-oriented acquirers strive for functional integration and use human integration to reduce target firm manager’s decision-making autonomy. Thus, achieving coordination after an acquisition can follow different paths that are closely aligned with the strategic orientation of the acquirer. In other words, different strategic orientations guide manager decisions, resulting in different paths to acquisition success.
Authors
- Nir N. Brueller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9413-1535)
- Florian Bauer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5781-2718)
- Qingxiong Weng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5426-6029)
- Svante Schriber (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4035-9531)
- Jeffrey G. Covin
- David King
Institutions
- Florida State University (US)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- University of Bristol (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
- Published
- 2026-10-28
- Primary Topic
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00