Unveiling the Gaps: Machine Learning Models for Unmeasured Ions

<b>Background:</b> Unmeasured ions (UIs) contribute significantly to acid-base disturbances in critically ill patients, yet the optimal parameter for their estimation remains uncertain. The most widely used indicators are the albumin-corrected anion gap (AGc), the strong ion gap (SIG), and the base excess gap (BEGap). <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 2274 ICU patients (2018-2022) were included in the development cohort, and an independent external validation cohort of 1202 patients (2023-2025) was used to assess temporal generalizability. Three approaches to blood gas analysis-traditional (PaCO<sub>2</sub>, HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, AGc), Stewart (PaCO<sub>2</sub>, SIDa, ATOT, SIG), and partitioned base excess (PaCO<sub>2</sub>, BECl, BEAlb, BELac, BEGap)-were evaluated. Multivariable linear regression (MLR) and machine learning (ML, random forest [RF], extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost], and support vector regression [SVR]) were applied to evaluate the explanatory performance of analytical approaches with respect to arterial pH. Model performance was assessed using adjusted R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, and MAE. Variable importance was quantified with tree-based methods, SHAP values, and permutation importance. All modeling and reporting steps followed the PROBAST-AI guideline. <b>Results:</b> In multiple linear regression (MLR), the partitioned base excess (BE) approach achieved the highest explanatory performance (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.949), followed by the traditional (0.929) and Stewart approaches (0.926). In ML analyses, model fit was high across all approaches. For the traditional approach, R<sup>2</sup> values were 0.979 with RF, 0.974 with XGBoost, and 0.934 with SVR. The Stewart's approach showed lower overall explanatory performance, with R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.876 (RF), 0.967 (XGBoost), and 0.996 (SVR). The partitioned BE approach again demonstrated the strongest explanatory performance, achieving R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.975 with XGBoost and 0.989 with SVR. Across all analytical models, BEGap consistently emerged as a strong and independent determinant of arterial pH, outperforming SIG and AGc. SIG showed an intermediate contribution, whereas AGc provided minimal independent explanatory value. Among ML models, XGBoost showed the most stable and accurate explanatory performance across approaches. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrates that BEGap is a practical, physiologically informative, and bedside-applicable parameter for assessing unmeasured ions, outperforming both AGc and SIG across linear and non-linear analytical models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16030427
Primary Topic
Renal function and acid-base balance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the Gaps: Machine Learning Models for Unmeasured Ions

Furkan Tontu, Zafer Çukurova
Diagnostics
Renal function and acid-base balance
article

Unveiling the Gaps: Machine Learning Models for Unmeasured Ions

Furkan Tontu, Zafer Çukurova
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Unmeasured ions (UIs) contribute significantly to acid-base disturbances in critically ill patients, yet the optimal parameter for their estimation remains uncertain. The most widely used indicators are the albumin-corrected anion gap (AGc), the strong ion gap (SIG), and the base excess gap (BEGap). <b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 2274 ICU patients (2018-2022) were included in the development cohort, and an independent external validation cohort of 1202 patients (2023-2025) was used to assess temporal generalizability. Three approaches to blood gas analysis-traditional (PaCO<sub>2</sub>, HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, AGc), Stewart (PaCO<sub>2</sub>, SIDa, ATOT, SIG), and partitioned base excess (PaCO<sub>2</sub>, BECl, BEAlb, BELac, BEGap)-were evaluated. Multivariable linear regression (MLR) and machine learning (ML, random forest [RF], extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost], and support vector regression [SVR]) were applied to evaluate the explanatory performance of analytical approaches with respect to arterial pH. Model performance was assessed using adjusted R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, and MAE. Variable importance was quantified with tree-based methods, SHAP values, and permutation importance. All modeling and reporting steps followed the PROBAST-AI guideline. <b>Results:</b> In multiple linear regression (MLR), the partitioned base excess (BE) approach achieved the highest explanatory performance (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.949), followed by the traditional (0.929) and Stewart approaches (0.926). In ML analyses, model fit was high across all approaches. For the traditional approach, R<sup>2</sup> values were 0.979 with RF, 0.974 with XGBoost, and 0.934 with SVR. The Stewart's approach showed lower overall explanatory performance, with R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.876 (RF), 0.967 (XGBoost), and 0.996 (SVR). The partitioned BE approach again demonstrated the strongest explanatory performance, achieving R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.975 with XGBoost and 0.989 with SVR. Across all analytical models, BEGap consistently emerged as a strong and independent determinant of arterial pH, outperforming SIG and AGc. SIG showed an intermediate contribution, whereas AGc provided minimal independent explanatory value. Among ML models, XGBoost showed the most stable and accurate explanatory performance across approaches. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrates that BEGap is a practical, physiologically informative, and bedside-applicable parameter for assessing unmeasured ions, outperforming both AGc and SIG across linear and non-linear analytical models.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(3)
Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Renal function and acid-base balance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.