Inverse Thermal Process Design for Interlayer Temperature Control in Wire-Directed Energy Deposition Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Wire-directed energy deposition (W-DED) produces steep thermal gradients and rapid heating-cooling cycles due to the moving heat source, where modest variations in process parameters significantly alter heat input per unit length and therefore the full thermal history. This sensitivity makes process tuning by trial-and-error or repeated FE sweeps expensive, motivating inverse analysis. This work proposes an inverse thermal process design framework that couples single-track experiments, a calibrated finite element (FE) thermal model, and a parametric physics-informed neural network (PINN) surrogate. By using experimentally calibrated heat-loss physics to define the training constraints, the PINN learns a parameterized thermal response from physics alone (no temperature data in the PINN loss), enabling inverse design without repeated FE runs. Thermocouple measurements are used to calibrate the convection film coefficient and emissivity in the FE model, and those parameters are used to train a parametric PINN over continuous ranges of arc power (1.5–3.0 kW) and travel speed (0.005–0.015 m/s) without using temperature data in the loss function. The trained PINN model was validated against the calibrated FE model at 3 probe locations with different power and travel speed combinations. Across these benchmark conditions, the mean absolute errors are between 6.5–17.4 °C, with cooling-tail errors ranging from 1.8–12.1 °C. The trained surrogate is then embedded in a sampling-based inverse optimization loop to identify power-speed combinations that achieve prescribed interlayer temperatures at a fixed dwell time. For target interlayer temperatures of 100, 130, and 160 °C with a 10 s dwell time, the optimized solutions remain within 3.3–5.6 °C of the target according to the PINN, while FE verification is within 4.0–6.6 °C. The results demonstrate that a physics-only parametric PINN surrogate enables inverse thermal process design without repeated FE runs while establishing a single-track baseline for extension to multi-track and multi-layer builds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10020052
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inverse Thermal Process Design for Interlayer Temperature Control in Wire-Directed Energy Deposition Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Fuad Hasan, Abderrachid Hamrani, Dwayne McDaniel, Tyler Dolmetsch et al.
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Inverse Thermal Process Design for Interlayer Temperature Control in Wire-Directed Energy Deposition Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Fuad Hasan, Abderrachid Hamrani, Dwayne McDaniel, Tyler Dolmetsch, Md Munim Rayhan, Somnath Somadder, Arvind Agarwal
article en

Abstract

Wire-directed energy deposition (W-DED) produces steep thermal gradients and rapid heating-cooling cycles due to the moving heat source, where modest variations in process parameters significantly alter heat input per unit length and therefore the full thermal history. This sensitivity makes process tuning by trial-and-error or repeated FE sweeps expensive, motivating inverse analysis. This work proposes an inverse thermal process design framework that couples single-track experiments, a calibrated finite element (FE) thermal model, and a parametric physics-informed neural network (PINN) surrogate. By using experimentally calibrated heat-loss physics to define the training constraints, the PINN learns a parameterized thermal response from physics alone (no temperature data in the PINN loss), enabling inverse design without repeated FE runs. Thermocouple measurements are used to calibrate the convection film coefficient and emissivity in the FE model, and those parameters are used to train a parametric PINN over continuous ranges of arc power (1.5–3.0 kW) and travel speed (0.005–0.015 m/s) without using temperature data in the loss function. The trained PINN model was validated against the calibrated FE model at 3 probe locations with different power and travel speed combinations. Across these benchmark conditions, the mean absolute errors are between 6.5–17.4 °C, with cooling-tail errors ranging from 1.8–12.1 °C. The trained surrogate is then embedded in a sampling-based inverse optimization loop to identify power-speed combinations that achieve prescribed interlayer temperatures at a fixed dwell time. For target interlayer temperatures of 100, 130, and 160 °C with a 10 s dwell time, the optimized solutions remain within 3.3–5.6 °C of the target according to the PINN, while FE verification is within 4.0–6.6 °C. The results demonstrate that a physics-only parametric PINN surrogate enables inverse thermal process design without repeated FE runs while establishing a single-track baseline for extension to multi-track and multi-layer builds.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 10(2)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Florida International University (US), Oldham Council (GB)
U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command, Army Research Laboratory
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.