Mechanistic Interpretability of Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools across numerous domains, yet they remain fundamentally opaque in their internal decision-making processes. This paper presents a comprehensive review of mechanistic interpretability, the nascent discipline dedicated to reverse-engineering the internal computations of neural networks, as applied to state-of-the-art LLMs. We examine the core challenges posed by polysemanticity and superposition, survey the principal techniques currently employed—including sparse autoencoders, activation patching, circuit tracing, and chain-of-thought monitoring—and assess their implications for AI safety, alignment, and governance. Drawing on recent breakthroughs by Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google DeepMind, we argue that mechanistic interpretability represents a critical frontier for ensuring that increasingly powerful AI systems remain understandable, auditable, and safe. We also identify open risks, including the fragility of chain-of-thought monitoring under adversarial optimization, and outline a forward-looking research agenda for the coming years.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18449589
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanistic Interpretability of Large Language Models

Zen Revista
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Mechanistic Interpretability of Large Language Models

Zen Revista
article en

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools across numerous domains, yet they remain fundamentally opaque in their internal decision-making processes. This paper presents a comprehensive review of mechanistic interpretability, the nascent discipline dedicated to reverse-engineering the internal computations of neural networks, as applied to state-of-the-art LLMs. We examine the core challenges posed by polysemanticity and superposition, survey the principal techniques currently employed—including sparse autoencoders, activation patching, circuit tracing, and chain-of-thought monitoring—and assess their implications for AI safety, alignment, and governance. Drawing on recent breakthroughs by Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google DeepMind, we argue that mechanistic interpretability represents a critical frontier for ensuring that increasingly powerful AI systems remain understandable, auditable, and safe. We also identify open risks, including the fragility of chain-of-thought monitoring under adversarial optimization, and outline a forward-looking research agenda for the coming years.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.