Evaluative properties and their non-causal powers

Abstract This paper introduces and defends an account of value and normative reasons according to which evaluative properties confer non-causal powers on their bearers and these powers explain the reason-providing feature of such properties. Moreover, these powers are included in the power profiles of the natural properties that realize evaluative properties. To illustrate its merits, I situate this account in the context of the buck-passing problem, which arises from an apparent tension between the ideas that (i) evaluative properties provide normative reasons for action and (ii) natural properties provide a complete explanation of the reasons we have for our actions. Since normative reasons of evaluative properties are seen as powers that are included in the power profiles of natural properties, the proposed account gains further plausibility by explaining away this apparent tension between (i) and (ii).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Philosophical Quarterly
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqag003
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluative properties and their non-causal powers

Umut Baysan
The Philosophical Quarterly
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Evaluative properties and their non-causal powers

Umut Baysan
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper introduces and defends an account of value and normative reasons according to which evaluative properties confer non-causal powers on their bearers and these powers explain the reason-providing feature of such properties. Moreover, these powers are included in the power profiles of the natural properties that realize evaluative properties. To illustrate its merits, I situate this account in the context of the buck-passing problem, which arises from an apparent tension between the ideas that (i) evaluative properties provide normative reasons for action and (ii) natural properties provide a complete explanation of the reasons we have for our actions. Since normative reasons of evaluative properties are seen as powers that are included in the power profiles of natural properties, the proposed account gains further plausibility by explaining away this apparent tension between (i) and (ii).

The Philosophical QuarterlyVol. 76(2)
University of Southampton (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.