Quantitative Ultrasound Radiomics for Predicting and Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

<b>Background & Objectives</b>: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) radiomics extracts microstructure-sensitive spectral features from radiofrequency data and may provide contrast-free, early indicators of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response in breast cancer. This review synthesized open access human studies evaluating QUS radiomics for a priori prediction and early on-treatment monitoring. <b>Methods</b>: Following PRISMA-2020, we included English, free full-text clinical studies of biopsy-proven breast cancer receiving NAC that reported QUS spectral parameters (mid-band fit, spectral slope/intercept) ± textures/derivatives and machine learning models against clinical/pathologic response. Data on design, RF acquisition/normalization, features, validation, and performance (area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity/specificity, balanced accuracy) were extracted. <b>Results</b>: Twelve cohorts were included. A priori baseline models achieved accuracies of 76-88% with AUCs 0.68-0.90; examples include 87% accuracy in a multi-institutional study, 82% accuracy/AUC 0.86 using texture-derivatives, 86% balanced accuracy with transfer learning, 88% accuracy/AUC 0.86 with deep learning, and AUC 0.90 in a hybrid QUS and molecular-subtype model. Early monitoring improved discrimination: week-1 results ranged from AUC 0.81 to 1.00 and accuracy 70 to 100%, noting that the upper bound was reported in a small cohort using combined QUS and diffuse optical spectroscopy features, while week 4 typically peaked (AUC 0.87-0.91; accuracy 80-86% in observational cohorts), and one series reported week-8 accuracy of 93%. Across reporting cohorts, mean AUC increased with a 0.05 absolute gain. A randomized feasibility study reported prospective week-4 model accuracy of 98% and demonstrated decision impact. <b>Conclusions</b>: QUS radiomics provides informative a priori prediction and strengthens by weeks 1-4 of NAC, supporting adaptive treatment windows without contrast or radiation. Standardized radiofrequency (RF) access, normalization, region of interest (ROI)/margin definitions, and external validation are priorities for clinical translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16030425
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Ultrasound Radiomics for Predicting and Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Loredana Gabriela Stana, Ramona Putin, Coralia Cotoraci, Elena Tanase
1 citations
Diagnostics
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
31.92
article

Quantitative Ultrasound Radiomics for Predicting and Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Loredana Gabriela Stana, Ramona Putin, Coralia Cotoraci, Elena Tanase
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background & Objectives</b>: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) radiomics extracts microstructure-sensitive spectral features from radiofrequency data and may provide contrast-free, early indicators of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response in breast cancer. This review synthesized open access human studies evaluating QUS radiomics for a priori prediction and early on-treatment monitoring. <b>Methods</b>: Following PRISMA-2020, we included English, free full-text clinical studies of biopsy-proven breast cancer receiving NAC that reported QUS spectral parameters (mid-band fit, spectral slope/intercept) ± textures/derivatives and machine learning models against clinical/pathologic response. Data on design, RF acquisition/normalization, features, validation, and performance (area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity/specificity, balanced accuracy) were extracted. <b>Results</b>: Twelve cohorts were included. A priori baseline models achieved accuracies of 76-88% with AUCs 0.68-0.90; examples include 87% accuracy in a multi-institutional study, 82% accuracy/AUC 0.86 using texture-derivatives, 86% balanced accuracy with transfer learning, 88% accuracy/AUC 0.86 with deep learning, and AUC 0.90 in a hybrid QUS and molecular-subtype model. Early monitoring improved discrimination: week-1 results ranged from AUC 0.81 to 1.00 and accuracy 70 to 100%, noting that the upper bound was reported in a small cohort using combined QUS and diffuse optical spectroscopy features, while week 4 typically peaked (AUC 0.87-0.91; accuracy 80-86% in observational cohorts), and one series reported week-8 accuracy of 93%. Across reporting cohorts, mean AUC increased with a 0.05 absolute gain. A randomized feasibility study reported prospective week-4 model accuracy of 98% and demonstrated decision impact. <b>Conclusions</b>: QUS radiomics provides informative a priori prediction and strengthens by weeks 1-4 of NAC, supporting adaptive treatment windows without contrast or radiation. Standardized radiofrequency (RF) access, normalization, region of interest (ROI)/margin definitions, and external validation are priorities for clinical translation.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(3)
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO), Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad (RO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
31.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.