Editing Margaret: Theatrical and Filmic Cuts in Much Ado About Nothing

Abstract: Margaret’s minor but pivotal role in Much Ado About Nothing has been endlessly reworked and restaged by modern theater practitioners trying to make sense of her as a character. Rather than arguing for a specific way to present the role, in this article I assert that the impulse to adapt Margaret in modern productions of Much Ado demonstrates the tension between gaps in early modern play-texts and modern realist acting techniques. This tension becomes most palpable in broadcast recordings of these productions where the camera’s cuts can both lessen and accentuate the gaps in character that the production may (or may not) have tried to fill through cuts in/additions to the text. By analyzing the rescripting of Margaret’s role at Shakespeare’s Globe in 2011 (dir. Jeremy Herrin) and the National Theatre (NT) in 2022 (dir. Simon Godwin), I argue that each production’s recording frames the labor of the actor playing her through a filmic grammar of closeups and cuts that foregrounds either her physical labor (the Globe) or her internal, emotional labor (NT). In the case of these two broadcasts of Much Ado , the cameras’ differential treatments of Margaret produce a critical reading that emphasizes the productions’ investment, or lack thereof, in staging female roles through the way they screen them.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Shakespeare bulletin
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/shb.2025.a981804
Primary Topic
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Editing Margaret: Theatrical and Filmic Cuts in Much Ado About Nothing

Emily MacLeod
Shakespeare bulletin
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
article

Editing Margaret: Theatrical and Filmic Cuts in Much Ado About Nothing

Emily MacLeod
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Margaret’s minor but pivotal role in Much Ado About Nothing has been endlessly reworked and restaged by modern theater practitioners trying to make sense of her as a character. Rather than arguing for a specific way to present the role, in this article I assert that the impulse to adapt Margaret in modern productions of Much Ado demonstrates the tension between gaps in early modern play-texts and modern realist acting techniques. This tension becomes most palpable in broadcast recordings of these productions where the camera’s cuts can both lessen and accentuate the gaps in character that the production may (or may not) have tried to fill through cuts in/additions to the text. By analyzing the rescripting of Margaret’s role at Shakespeare’s Globe in 2011 (dir. Jeremy Herrin) and the National Theatre (NT) in 2022 (dir. Simon Godwin), I argue that each production’s recording frames the labor of the actor playing her through a filmic grammar of closeups and cuts that foregrounds either her physical labor (the Globe) or her internal, emotional labor (NT). In the case of these two broadcasts of Much Ado , the cameras’ differential treatments of Margaret produce a critical reading that emphasizes the productions’ investment, or lack thereof, in staging female roles through the way they screen them.

Shakespeare bulletinVol. 43(3)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.