Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnostic Tools Used to Detect Fungal Infections: A Systematic Review

<b>Background:</b> Fungal infections are considered a global health concern, resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates, especially in immunocompromised individuals. Traditional diagnostic techniques, such as microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), suffer from low sensitivity, long processing time, and accessibility challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools have demonstrated potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. This systematic study assesses the progress, precision, and efficacy of AI-driven diagnostic tools for fungal infections within various clinical contexts in comparison to traditional procedures. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA principles. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Ovid, focusing on research employing AI models to diagnose fungal infections. The inclusion criteria were research that compared AI-based tools with conventional diagnostic methods in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed utilizing validated instruments, such as the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). <b>Results:</b> Eleven research studies met the inclusion criteria: six retrospective and five prospective investigations. AI models, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Faster R-CNN, VGG19, and MobileNet, have improved diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity compared to traditional methods. However, differences in dataset quality, model validation, and real-world applicability remain as limitations. <b>Conclusions:</b> AI-driven diagnostic technologies provide significant benefits in identifying fungal infections, improving the speed and accuracy of diagnoses. However, additional extensive investigations and clinical validation are required to improve model generalizability and facilitate smooth incorporation into healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16030450
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnostic Tools Used to Detect Fungal Infections: A Systematic Review

Ragheed Alnufaei, Anwar A. Sayed, Lina M. Alkahtani, Alaa AL Mashaikhi et al.
Diagnostics
AI in cancer detection
article

Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnostic Tools Used to Detect Fungal Infections: A Systematic Review

Ragheed Alnufaei, Anwar A. Sayed, Lina M. Alkahtani, Alaa AL Mashaikhi, Noir M. Albuqami, Yara A. Alharbi, Duaa A. Aljuhaymi
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Fungal infections are considered a global health concern, resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates, especially in immunocompromised individuals. Traditional diagnostic techniques, such as microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), suffer from low sensitivity, long processing time, and accessibility challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools have demonstrated potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. This systematic study assesses the progress, precision, and efficacy of AI-driven diagnostic tools for fungal infections within various clinical contexts in comparison to traditional procedures. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA principles. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Ovid, focusing on research employing AI models to diagnose fungal infections. The inclusion criteria were research that compared AI-based tools with conventional diagnostic methods in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed utilizing validated instruments, such as the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). <b>Results:</b> Eleven research studies met the inclusion criteria: six retrospective and five prospective investigations. AI models, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Faster R-CNN, VGG19, and MobileNet, have improved diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity compared to traditional methods. However, differences in dataset quality, model validation, and real-world applicability remain as limitations. <b>Conclusions:</b> AI-driven diagnostic technologies provide significant benefits in identifying fungal infections, improving the speed and accuracy of diagnoses. However, additional extensive investigations and clinical validation are required to improve model generalizability and facilitate smooth incorporation into healthcare systems.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(3)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), King Abdulaziz University (SA), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), Taibah University (SA), King Abdulaziz Hospital (SA), King Faisal University (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.