Saddle Time as Transitional Order

Abstract This article contributes to the special issue on transitional order. The editors identify transitional orders along four dimensions: uncertainty, time, strategic ambiguity, and intentionality. This contribution argues that these four dimensions also have a conceptual dimension and that an inquiry into concepts and conceptual change can be fruitful to explore current and past transitions. This contribution suggests that the distinction of “change within the system” and “change of the system” can be recast in terms of Koselleck’s notion of Saddle Time. To show the promise of Saddle Time, it uses the recent “End of Liberal Order” debate as a vantage point to suggest that if the liberal order comes to an end, we should expect also a reconfiguration of the spatial and temporal configurations that made up and stabilized that liberal order. Changes in the spatial and temporal configurations show in conceptual changes and inquiries into concepts can thus shed a light onto whether indeed we find ourselves in the midst of a new “Saddle Time” in the making. This is traced by taking recent debates within the EU on Strategic Autonomy as an “exploratory inquiry”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Studies Quarterly
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksaf118
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Saddle Time as Transitional Order

Oliver Kessler
Global Studies Quarterly
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Saddle Time as Transitional Order

Oliver Kessler
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article contributes to the special issue on transitional order. The editors identify transitional orders along four dimensions: uncertainty, time, strategic ambiguity, and intentionality. This contribution argues that these four dimensions also have a conceptual dimension and that an inquiry into concepts and conceptual change can be fruitful to explore current and past transitions. This contribution suggests that the distinction of “change within the system” and “change of the system” can be recast in terms of Koselleck’s notion of Saddle Time. To show the promise of Saddle Time, it uses the recent “End of Liberal Order” debate as a vantage point to suggest that if the liberal order comes to an end, we should expect also a reconfiguration of the spatial and temporal configurations that made up and stabilized that liberal order. Changes in the spatial and temporal configurations show in conceptual changes and inquiries into concepts can thus shed a light onto whether indeed we find ourselves in the midst of a new “Saddle Time” in the making. This is traced by taking recent debates within the EU on Strategic Autonomy as an “exploratory inquiry”.

Global Studies QuarterlyVol. 6(1)
University of Erfurt (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.